User:HydrophobicDuck/sandbox
 | This is a user sandbox of HydrophobicDuck. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
100 % Mid Term Quiz [Part 1, each question is worth 3.8 % for full credit, for Part II, each question is work 5 % for full credit]
[edit]My Mid-Term Quiz for LIBY 1210-09 Spring 2016
3.8 My real name is: Bernardo Castillo
3.8 My Research Topic is: The Role of Religion in Politics
3.8 Key words related to my Research Topic are: Religion and Politics
3.8 I chose to read and evaluate the article titled: Religion
3.8 1. Is there a warning banner at the top of the article? Yes
This article is about a general set of beliefs about existence. For other uses, see Religion (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Religious denomination. "Religious" redirects here. For a member of a Catholic religious institute, see Religious (Catholicism).
3.8 The warning banner is to differentiate the other topics the article could be referring to. The warning banner provides links to redirect users to those topics.
3.8 The lead section of the article is somewhat difficult to understand, but becomes easier to understand with multiple readings.
3.8 The structure of the article is clear with several headings and subheadings. Headings, subheadings, and images are in their proper place, with footnotes when needed.
3.8 The article provides an excellent overview and covers many variables concerning the topic.
3.8 The article contains no bias or anything that would constitute as an opinion.
3.8 The article cites rather credible sources whether it be books or the Constitution itself.
3.8 The lead section is written in clear English. The article has a neutral perspective about the topic. The article does not refer to any unnamed persons. While the article does not seem to omit any details, some of them could be expanded upon. Some sections are longer than others, but it seems to maintain a balance of information. The article seems to lack more footnotes and references, but there is still an acceptable amount of them. There seems to be no hostile dialogue, but rather friendly suggestions to encourage editors to make the proper changes.
5 Currency (When was the last update of this article? hint: check the View History) April 26, 2016 13:36
5 Authority (What evidence do you find that the author(s) of this article have the appropriate credentials to write on this topic?) One of the authors has a variety of knowledge and is a constantly active member of the discussion board.
5 Relevance (to your research topic) Talks about religion in general, which may be a key variable.
5 Depth The article goes into great detail about its subjects, but there could be more details.
5 Information Format (I hope this one will be easy for you.) The article is written with the general public in mind is written as such so that it may be easily understood.
5 Object (what is the purpose for creating this article?) To inform about the different religious groups and practices without resorting to opinions.