Jump to content

User:HitroMilanese/Archive25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Approval request for Gulabuddin Sukhanwar

[edit]

Hi, based on the recommendations, I have now further improved the biography of Gulabuddin Sukhanwar that very well meets and is aligned with the Wikipedia policy. I would appreciate if you take the time, review and approve it so it is moved from Draft to the Wikipedia Article. Then, I will keep an eye to keep improving it further. Thank you. Sanchoof (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Why my page is not published

[edit]

Please recheck Aurrabhatnagarbadoni99 (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

@Aurrabhatnagarbadoni99
The subject is not meeting WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Also read WP:TOOSOON. These policies and guidelines will give you a complete idea why this draft was not accepted. Regards. Hitro talk 08:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Though all are okay but still it's not publish Aurrabhatnagarbadoni99 (talk) 08:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
My subject meets the requirements Aurrabhatnagarbadoni99 (talk) 08:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
I do not see that she is meeting any of the notability requirements. However, you are free to resubmit so that a different reviewer may check it. Regards. Hitro talk 08:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft on Kananga (documentary)

[edit]

You rejected my submission for Kananga, the documentary film. I am not a troll, and this is a real film that you can watch on YouTube. I listed 10 citations on this article, and have been waiting for a very long time to get it accepted. I don't see what there is to cite anymore, and I would like to know why you marked it as "citation inefficiency", even though, every day, I see accepted Wikipedia articles with less references than mine. What have I done wrong and what can I do to get my article accepted? Thanks. KeymasterOne (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

@KeymasterOne
Hello there,
I know you are not a troll and this is a real film. However, in order to get the draft accepted at Wikipedia you need to demonstrate notability in accordance to notability guidelines. The topic must meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Currently, the film does not appear to meet any of those two guidelines. Apart from that, the references that you used are mostly unreliable. Kindly, see WP:RS and add references accordingly. Regards. Hitro talk 08:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft on Terseer Ugbor

[edit]

I am having difficulties publishing the page of my federal lawmaker Terseer Ugbor, i have added citations and they are legitimate informations but it hasn't been approved. i need a way out please Or Mbajor (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

@Or Mbajor
Hi there,
I guess you have skipped the AfC process and moved the draft to mainspace yourself. You should not have done that though. Since, it is on main space now, it will be reviewed by New Page Patroller and will be tagged with maintenance template if required. Regards. Hitro talk 08:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for your correction, however i will put in work to standardize the article and have the template removed. thanks and best regards! Or Mbajor (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Harry Mack

[edit]

Hi, I'm just a random guy from Germay who came across the freestyle rapper Harry Mack on YouTube about a year ago and started following his content and his career as well as checking out his existing material. Today I wondered what I would find on his Wikipedia page and was astonished that he doesn't have one. A quick search showed me that a draft for a page exists (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Harry_Mack), but it was declined by you. This is the first time I'm reacting to anything on Wikipedia, so I don't know the exact rules for inclusion of a person, but I'm quite shocked here because Harry Mack is so huge that even I stumbled upon him and started following him, even though I'm not even the biggest rap fan or expert. Many consider him to be the most talented freestyle rapper of all time. He went on a worldwide tour in 2023. He also collaborated with other artists, for example Marc Rebillet, who has a page (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Marc_Rebillet). So I just wanted to let you know that this omission seems very random. Thank you and have a nice day 2A00:6020:B410:6D00:DC3F:7E28:6B0A:1503 (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,
A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article on Wikipedia when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The sources that you added to the draft are mostly unreliable. YouTube, Spotify or TikTok are considered unreliable as they are mostly WP:USERGENERATED. Please see WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO and add references accordingly after that you may resubmit the draft for another review. Regards. Hitro talk 08:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I have to agree, you're doing a disservice to wikipedia's credibility when youtubers like Harry Mack are not considered suitable for a wiki page. Maybe the apparently complicated rules that exist need to be tweaked for the changing media landscape. 2001:67C:10EC:3C81:8000:0:0:FA (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft on IBM Think conference

[edit]

Hi! I know you receive so many messages from AfC submitters that are denied so I apologize in advance. I updated Draft:IBM Think conference with relatively reliable third party sources and want to ask if it looks OK so I can resubmit the page. If not, I can work more on the article. Thanks. VectorVoyager (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, the subject has 1, 2, 3 multiple featured indepth article on him. Also has 4 , 5 (added recedntly)and many news articles about the TikTok award he got. All the sources have their own Wikipedia page and are considered as notable references. So, why the article was rejected? And would you mind revisiting the draft to ensure the article is okay to go on Wikipedia Livespace? Iccuggattu (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

@Iccuggattu
Hi there,
To be honest, I really can not see credible claim of significance here. Is his noteworthiness attributed only to winning the TikTok Award? I believe you have removed information related to his music career which was my basis of previous decline. Since, you have already resubmitted it, I will leave this for the fresh pair of eyes. Regards. Hitro talk 09:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Draft:Manoj_Akhare

[edit]

He is a notable figure in Maharashtra, He is the current head of Sambhaji Brigade, the Political Party's wikipedia is long back approved why isn't the page of the president of the party not approved? Him along with the brigade has been fighting for the rights of Maratha Caste Community since 90s, you can find enough news. Ojaskedar00 (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,
In order to get the draft approved, you need to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Unless the notability has been asserted, the draft will not be accepted. Kindly, read these guidelines and add references accordingly. Regards. Hitro talk 09:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for the review of the draft. You declined the request with the comment "Presented source does not appear to have any relevance to the topic". The reference is not related to the complete post but the row it is mentioned in. You can visit the link and search for "Monali Thakur".

Secondly, I posted a topic on the the talk page despite knowing nobody will probably read it before reviewing the draft. Here is it:

The content on the Draft:List of songs recorded by Monali Thakur article is not new. It is just to list all the songs recorded by Monali Thakur (Indian singer) which are already listed on the original singer page i.e. Monali Thakur. Because of this, the page length has become too long. Hence, this page shifts the Monali Thakur#Discography section to this page. This is done for all the major singers already.

I didn't know how to share this message with the reviewer. Let me know how to do this the correct way if possible. Waonderer (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Request on 06:58:52, 23 February 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Tsund7901

[edit]



Tsund7901 (talk) 06:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I am trying to make a page for a local business. I keep being reviewed and denied, with reviewers stating my sources are not reliable. They are from primarily from local news stations. Any help as to how to get this issue rectified so that I can publish the article would be appreciated.

Hello there. The sources that you have included may be reliable but they do not show significant coverage. The subjects are deemed notable only when they receive significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources. Passing mentions, routine coverage or directory listings are not enough to assert notability. Please see WP:NCOMPANY and demonstrate the notability accordingly. Regards. Hitro talk 07:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Reference Help

[edit]

You may be aware that creating the Rude Tales of Magic Wikipedia page is first article I have ever drafted on Wikipedia. I saw that when my draft was denied, your main complaint was that my sources were not reliable and that there were too few references. I found this fair, and yet it was very difficult to find reliable sources considering that Rude Tales of Magic is not a very large podcast. What would the needed references entail and where would you suggest I find them?

Best, ChickenLordd (talk) 03:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@ChickenLordd
Hello there,
I do not have any idea where you may find sources related to this podcast. However, if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Regards. Hitro talk 06:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Review: EskanderBet Wikipedia Article

[edit]

Dear @HitroMilanese I'm writing to request a review of the EskanderBet article for inclusion on Wikipedia. The article provides valuable insights into the online platform's background, history, offerings, and associated brands like SportChamps. It presents factual information about licensing, betting platforms, and product offerings in a neutral manner, serving as an educational resource for readers interested in sports betting. I believe the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion as an encyclopaedic entry and has been updated accordingly to include relevant sources as per your request. I respectfully request your reconsideration. Ace Wager (talk) 07:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@Ace Wager
Hi there,
Please read WP:YFA and attempt article creation only after that. Currently, the draft is written in promotional tone and only serving to advertise the business. Also see WP:WHATWIKIPEDIAISNOT. Regards. Hitro talk 07:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have rewritten this according to your suggestions. I would appreciate it if you could review the new article published. Ace Wager (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Manju K Manohar

[edit]

Hi, There are websites including reliable ones like zeenews about her. Zeenews is a famous TV channel as well in India. 2406:7400:BD:2C45:4104:614A:812C:3FF1 (talk) 20:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft for On2Cook

[edit]

Hi,

The draft composed for On2Cook has citations such as The Times of India, New Indian Express, The Better India and various other Independent and notable publishing. Various new references have been added as well and the article has been updated. I believe the page meets wikipedia's criteria for inclusion as an encyclopedic entry. Please have another look at the citations and reconsider. Thank you.

Regards,

Jyoti Sudhir Jyotisudhir25 (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,
Please resubmit the draft if you believe that the topic is meeting WP:NCOMPANY. I will leave it for another reviewer. Regards. Hitro talk 10:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Alright ,Thank you for your help!
Regards,
Jyoti Sudhir Jyotisudhir25 (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft for Direct Preference Optimization

[edit]

Hi HitroMilanese,

You marked my draft with 'WP:RS'.

I have used 5 sources on the article, 3 of which are from academics and their papers on arxiv.org, 1 is from a company called huggingface and 1 which is from towardsdatascience. Both huggingface and towardsdatascience.com are well known platforms/websites to the data science and machine learning community.

Other than for towardsdatascience.com, I don't really understand from your comment what causes the issue.

Best regards. Ibnu Fulan (talk) 11:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Ibnu Fulan
Hello there,
Please see WP:arXiv and WP:MEDIUM. Regards. Hitro talk 11:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I did not know that arxiv.com and towardsdatascience.com/medium were unreliable sources for wikipedia.
However this makes me question how other very similar articles like the one about Proximal Policy Optimization did get through. The sources mainly consist of papers on arxiv.org, towardsdatascience.com articles and YouTube videos. Did I miss something?
Best regards. Ibnu Fulan (talk) 12:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Actually a large portion of Wikipedia articles on the topic of machine learning consist of academic papers and towardsdatascience articles. Ibnu Fulan (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

About Rejecting the article

[edit]

I understand the problems you have identified. But I want to point out that he is a influential and famous person and needs to be in wikipedia. Further suggestions are appreciated.

Marjukur Rahib (talk) 09:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

@Marjukur Rahib
Hello there,
A common misconception about notability is that importance or uniqueness equals notability. But some things that are assumed to be important lack sources that are required by Wikipedia in order to meet the general notability guidelines or other inclusion criteria. Therefore, they are not included.
I suggest you to see WP:N and improve your draft accordingly. Regards. Hitro talk 10:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering how to fix the article that I am currently working on? Bondsanpeanuts (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

@Bondsanpeanuts
Hi there,
Please see WP:YFA and WP:NSKATE and improve the article accordingly. Also see WP:REFBEGIN for citing your sources appropriately. Hitro talk 10:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Population Balance

[edit]

Hi HitroMilanese, my first article (Draft:Population Balance) was just speedily deleted. I'm not sure why. They labeled it promotional - but I am not paid or promoting this topic. All sources I used were secondary, independent, verifiable, and citations quotes were direct from citations, not my freehand interpretation. I modeled my article off the wiki for a similar organization https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Population_Connection (which cites itself from its own website and was still approved!) and mine was still firmly denied without explanation. Any tips? Could someone else more experienced than me write it? Eddyl (talk) 04:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I've replied to Eddyl on their talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hitro, can you help me with the problem on the drafted article Draft:Sierra Valley Gardens to resolve all of it's issues. I really need to publish that. Thanks.

[edit]

The drafted article [[Draft:Valley Valley Gardens]] is still un approved. Why? I already made some improvements on the drafted page which some of its sources now I link from any independent media. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Adhesivecobra17
Hi there,
Please see WP:GNG. In order to establish notability, you need to demonstrate that the topic has received significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. Presently, I don't think that the basic requirements of the notability guidelines are being fulfilled. Regards. Hitro talk 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Matthew_Jordan_Smith_(Photographer)

[edit]

Thank you for reviewing my submission Draft:Matthew_Jordan_Smith_(Photographer). It did not have enough citations so it was declined, which is understandable. I went back in and added more citations (went from 3 to 16) and it was declined again. I asked that reviewer for feedback and if you have time, I would appreciate advice on what I can do to make the submission better. I really thought I had enough citations this time. Thank you for your time. Jennifer Bak (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

[edit]

Hello HitroMilanese,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Can you help me with reviewing this draft? It looks very promising, but I don't have the authority to review it. Additionally, the author requests the draft to be listed as ECP. I will try to clean it up a little bit so that you can review it easier. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 11:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@YesI'mOnFire
Hi there, the article is already on the mainspace, it does not need to go through AfC process anymore. I just checked that it is already protected indefinitely. Regards. Hitro talk 11:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Welp, I just wasted my time trying to fix references for the draft that already has an article (and the main contributor got blocked, too). Anyway, thanks for the heads up! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 13:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:CARDINAL PUBG

[edit]
THANK YOU GRAFFANO PUBG (talk) 11:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

ABOUT: Rejecting article on SYMMES INN

[edit]

I have added more sources on the SYMMES INN draft to support all of the history. This draft article on SYMMES INN is simply a translation of an existing Wikipédia (Fr.) article that can be found here: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auberge_Symmes All of the people and places in the SYMMES INN article have Wikipedia pages of their own (Aylmer, Charles Symmes, Philemon Wright etc.) with fully-sourced accepted references. Please elaborate what specific parts of the article need work if any. Rickh99 (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,
The version of the draft that I declined had only 5 sources and large portion of the submission was unsourced. Your resubmitted draft shows commendable effort with the addition of more sources, which addresses the previous issue of insufficient referencing. However, to ensure a fair evaluation, I believe it's best for another reviewer to take a fresh look at it. It's worth mentioning that while information might be present on French Wikipedia, it doesn't automatically validate its inclusion on English Wikipedia, as each operates under distinct guidelines and policies. Hitro talk 10:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

review on Mahalingam Draft

[edit]

Dear Hitro,

V.M.Mahalingam is a notable and famous Playback singer from Tamil Movie industry and he has been a very famous Tamil Folk Singer. He is honoured as judge in singing competitions in all Major TV shows. Please review the draft I have resubmitted along with proper suitable links Thanking you in advance. Ghkguru (talk) 08:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,
To have your draft accepted, it's essential to establish the subject's notability according to Wikipedia notability guidelines such as WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Could you specify which criteria from these guidelines you believe the subject satisfies? Regards. Hitro talk 10:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Dear Hitro,
Thank you very much for pointing out to indicate the notability according to WP:GNG
I have added Reference 2 for his very popular notability on tamil folk mother song which is an ongoing living example with 28M+ views. I have added Reference 11 for his another notability with genuine article from World famous Isha Center by Sadhguru where every year during Shivratri , only very very limited top notch notable performers do their programme. This year 2024 one can see in the reference 11 the list of performers self explaining their notability across India where Mahalingam also was delivering his performance. His performance evidence aslso has been added with proper links.
Kindly review and please arrange to approve as I feel these are the key points for his notability which will cover as per WP:GNG policy guidelines.
Thanking you for your continuous support and Guidance,
Best Regards,
Harikrishnan. Ghkguru (talk) 07:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

About: Rejection articles on "Par Yel"

[edit]

Dear Hitro,

After seeing your message, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Par_Yel, I added more reliable sources, and added more references on my articles. Please review my articles, and let me know if you need something regarding with my article.

Best, Theint Noe (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,
Thank you for improving the draft. However, I believe many of the sources such as from Medium, factsanddetails.com, etc. are not considered reliable at Wikipedia. Anyway, I will leave this draft for another reviewer so that they may analyse the sourcing independently. Regards. Hitro talk 11:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Assam Legislative Assembly election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Assam Legislative Assembly election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Soni (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
@Soni
Hello there,
This one has survived one AfD that I nominated. Kindly check the history of this page and inform concerned users. I am not the one to be informed. Regards Hitro talk 21:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Thanks, this was probably caused by you being the first editor to move the page, or similar. The page history is a bit of a mess. Soni (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft review

[edit]

Hi @HitroMilanese, Requesting you to review this draft Draft:S S Karthikeya. CraftsLane117 (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

@CraftsLane117
Hi there,
Please provide three sources where he received significant coverage based on his own accomplishments, rather than inherited notability. Regards. Hitro talk 15:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

draft: a bridge to the desert

[edit]

Hi @HitroMilanese, I corrected the sources as requested. Can you give me feedback on my draft?

Draft:A Bridge to the desert

thanks Kairoserotifilos (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

@HitroMilanese can you give me feedback on my improvements? on this draft? Draft:A Bridge to the desert thanks Kairoserotifilos (talk) Kairoserotifilos (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there,
I believe that more robust sources are needed to effectively establish notability. Therefore, I will leave this draft for another reviewer to examine with a fresh perspective. Regards. Hitro talk 12:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

review on Mahalingam Draft

[edit]

Dear Hitro,

  On 11th May 2024 I had responded your message after taking the necessary modifications based on your feedback.

I am not sure whether you noticed my message (below I have re attached) Kindly arrange to review Thank you Best Regards, G.Harikrishnan.


Thank you very much for pointing out to indicate the notability according to WP:GNG I have added Reference 2 for his very popular notability on tamil folk mother song which is an ongoing living example with 28M+ views. I have added Reference 11 for his another notability with genuine article from World famous Isha Center by Sadhguru where every year during Shivratri , only very very limited top notch notable performers do their programme. This year 2024 one can see in the reference 11 the list of performers self explaining their notability across India where Mahalingam also was delivering his performance. His performance evidence aslso has been added with proper links. Kindly review and please arrange to approve as I feel these are the key points for his notability which will cover as per WP:GNG policy guidelines. Thanking you for your continuous support and Guidance, Best Regards, Harikrishnan. Ghkguru (talk) 07:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Ghkguru (talk) 11:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi there,
Thank you for your efforts in improving the draft. However, I still believe that the subject does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG.
The sources cited from LinkedIn and YouTube are not considered reliable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Additionally, I do not see significant coverage from other reliable sources that would establish notability. Given these concerns, I will leave this for another reviewer to assess. Regards. Hitro talk 18:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Dear Hitro,
Thank you for your response. I could not understand WG that does not take into account on Youtube marks which is very visible public notability when views are really in millions and growing showing the music director and singer's notability.
The reference 11 shown is not youtube and not Linkln as you mentioned. It is https://isha.sadhguru.org/mahashivratri/performing-artists/
which Sadhguru's World famous Isha foundation where every year's Shivrathri, a musical event is conducted where world famous singers are performing. A singer not having notability cannot enter into such an event. What the provided reference is from the very genuine list of perfromers in Sadhguru's isha fiundation music event in this year where you can see Mahalingam along with world renounced singers list as performers. I still believe this is one of the genuine reference for proving the notability of the singer as per WG. and is reliable source.
Request you to review otherwise please let it be reviewed by another person to get the feedback and do the needful. Thank you for your valuable points and time and support.
Best Regards,
G.Harikrishnan Ghkguru (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Panitan Budkaew

[edit]

Thamk you so much for your last suggestion. I have made the recommended improvements to the article, Draft:Panitan Budkaew, based on your valuable feedback. Could you please take a moment to review the revised article and provide any additional feedback or approval? Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Qiufengruyuan (talk) 09:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

@Qiufengruyuan
Hello there,
I am not able to see how the subject is meeting WP:NACTOR. I will leave this for someone who has expertise in Thai references. From my point of view, this draft is still having the same issues that I pointed during my last review. Regards. Hitro talk 17:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft review of Anil Paduri.

[edit]

Hi, based on the recommendations, I have now further improved the biography of Anil Paduri, who happens to be a notable VFX supervisor and a film director working predominantly in Telugu film industry. he has directed a Telugu film Romantic which also has a Wikipedia page. I would appreciate if you take the time, review and approve it so it is moved from Draft to the Wikipedia Article. Then, I will keep an eye to keep improving it further. Thank you. Thenamesakehistorian (talk) 07:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)