Jump to content

User:Hansmuller/Five Pillars plus one

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do we want this at Wikimedia, hurting a Pillar? Temple of Jupiter (Roman Heliopolis), Baalbek, Libanon, 2013.
Six Corinthian pillars of the Temple of Jupiter (Roman Heliopolis), Baalbek, Libanon. The pillars have a height of 30 m and a width of nearly 2,5 m. On the front a piece of a frieze with a sculpted lion's head, 2008.
Francis Bedford (1815-94): Temple of the Sun and Temple of Jupiter, Baalbek, Lebanon, 4 May 1862.
John Carne: Six separate pillars of the Great Temple of Baalbek, Libanon, 1836.

Beside the guidelines of the Five pillars of Wikipedia there is another principle of the Wikimedia movement, the stated purpose of the Wikimedia Foundation: to collect and develop educational content and more. So there might be a sixth of zeroth pillar if you like, that we could acknowledge in addition to the well-known quintet, together 'Wikipedia:Five pillars plus one'.[1]

Five Pillars

[edit]

Just like Indonesia with its Pancasila and islam with its Five Pillars Wikipedia (WP) also has five axiom-like basic principles. What they entail we can express tentatively and somewhat pedantically with quantifier operators, logical-mathematical symbols (this could be improved on):[2]

  1. ∃ encyclopedia WP
  2. WP = neutral
  3. WP ⊂ free content
  4. ∃ code of conduct of WP
  5. ∄ hard rules of WP

Pillars 3 and 5 are revolutionary. That is why Pillar 5 is hard to stomach for some, and Pillar 3 can cause conflicts with commercial and other interests.

An extra Pillar of Wikipedia: the purpose is educational content

[edit]

But apparently there is still another fundamental principle on educational content, expounded in the Bylaws of the Wikimedia Foundation, the managing agency of Wikimedia websites and more. (An important advantage for WMF: because of this principle gifts to WMF are taxfree in the US (i think "501(c)(3) tax-exempt"). This helps in keeping adverts out of Wikipedia, so that the neutrality of Wikipedia, Pillar 2, can be guaranteed more easily. It is an overarching principle for the whole of Wikimedia, so it certainly holds for Wikipedia, the main project of the Wikimedia Foundation:


Zeroth of Sixth Pillar?

[edit]

So we might propose a sextet of pillars for Wikipedia, just like the Six articles of faith in islam. (But of course the Wikimedia movement is not a religion like islam, however Wikimedia might have some religious aspects.) As seems natural, this idea of six pillars of Wikipedia has cropped up previously.[4]

We could give the extra Pillar for Educational Content the Number 0, as it is a fundamental starting point that precedes the standard Five Pillars, or Number 6, as we only now come up with this consideration as an afterthought.

Questions, answers and pillars

[edit]

The Five or Six Pillars, including the Purpose above, answer questions about Wikipedia, such as:

Question about Wikipedia Answer Pillar number
Why Wikipedia? To collect and develop educational content 0 or 6
What is Wikipedia? An encyclopedia 1
What approach does Wikipedia take? Neutral point of view 2
What is the legal status of its content? Free content 3
How do Wikipedians behave? Code of conduct 4
Is it dogmatic? No firm rules 5

(This table was not meant to serve as a sort of lay catechism, however... :-)

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ This short essay is a translation of a previous Dutch version, which was threatened with deletion at w:nl:Wikipedia:Vijf_zuilen_plus_een.
  2. ^ "HTML Math Symbols, Math Entities and ASCII Math Character Code Reference". www.toptal.com. 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  3. ^ "Bylaws. ARTICLE II - STATEMENT OF PURPOSE". foundation.wikimedia.org. 10 July 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  4. ^ Meta wikimedia:Order of Just Wikipedians