User:Gpp105io/Human trafficking in California/Yessel Garcia Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Isabelle Osorio
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Isabelleosorio/Human trafficking in California
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- yes
- Is the content added up-to-date?
- some sources date back to 2003 which is not recent but one seems to be from 2018 and that is more up to date info
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- you mention that you moved some examples but Im not sure as to where they were moved
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
- yes, I believe so
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral?
- yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- no
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- no, all sections seems to be relatively the same sizes (except maybe the role of coyotes section
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- no
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- annual reports and studies seem reliable but can't check because there is no link to sources
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- yes but needs links
- Are the sources current?
- some seem to be but can't seem to be sure because there are no citations to show the year of publication
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- don't know the authors because they are not cited
- Check a few links. Do they work?
- there are no links to new sources but the links connecting to other wiki pages work
Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- yes, the information that was removed or reorganized made the overall article more concise and clear
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- no
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- yes
Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- yes
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- made sections of the article much more easier to read and digest
- How can the content added be improved?
- perhaps just create a bibliography with the sources used and link the sources so they are accessible to the reader