User:Giselleflores16

If the Wikimedia Foundation approached me looking for recommendations for how to manage the impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on the Wikipedia online community, I would provide them with several suggestions. My suggestions would include making changes to the user guidelines and policies, providing users with education on the use of artificial intelligence, and examining and tracking the impact of artificial intelligence. The objective of my suggestions would be to help the Wikimedia Foundation to maintain Wikipedia’s integrity.

The first suggestion I would recommend to the Wikimedia Foundation to help with managing the impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on the Wikipedia online community would be to create clear guidelines and policies for all Wikipedia users. If the Wikimedia Foundation were to choose to change and create guidelines and policies for all Wikipedia users that were clearer, it could help limit the amount of threats Wikipedia faces daily. This includes limiting the number of spammers, trolls, griefers, and vandalizers. Some of the changes Wikipedia could make to the guidelines and policies could be adding user editing requirements. The Wikimedia Foundation could require users to disclose if artificial intelligence has been used or not in an edit. They could do this by requiring users to mark a yes or no box before they can publish, if they have or have not used artificial intelligence in their edit. Another change that could be made is adding content verification. The Wikimedia Foundation could put any content suspected of being created by artificial intelligence under review to be looked over by a human. The review by the human would check for inaccurate information or any unhelpful edits. After making these changes the Wikimedia Foundation could notify their users about the new changes to their guidelines and policies by sending a mass email to all users’ emails. Or by displaying a banner on users’ Wikipedia homepages when they log in. By making these changes to the Wikipedia guidelines and policies, the Wikimedia Foundation would be making it clear to users that they will be looking out for artificial intelligence use. But also, will be helping to limit the number of threats Wikipedia faces.

The second suggestion I would recommend to the Wikimedia Foundation to help with managing the impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on the Wikipedia online community would be to educate Wikipedia users on the use of artificial intelligence. The Wikimedia Foundation could educate users on different topics regarding artificial intelligence through articles and website banners. These topics could cover information like the pros and cons of using artificial intelligence and how to properly use artificial intelligence. By Wikimedia Foundation educating Wikipedia users about artificial intelligence, it can only lead to positive outcomes. These positive outcomes include improvement of content quality, expansion of user participation, encouragement of responsible use of artificial intelligence, and growing trust and transparency with artificial intelligence. These are all outcomes that align with the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation. By educating Wikipedia users about artificial intelligence the content created by users using artificial intelligence will become better quality and more reliable. The education of artificial intelligence will expand the number of users and contributors to Wikipedia because it will become easier for them to contribute. Education on artificial intelligence will encourage users to use artificial intelligence responsibly, rather than not at all. Education on artificial intelligence will allow users to feel they can trust artificial intelligence more overall, the use of artificial intelligence on Wikipedia, and will help limit misconceptions about it. By adding this change to Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation won’t necessarily be limiting the amount of artificial intelligence used. But will improve how artificial intelligence is used on Wikipedia.

After making the two other changes I suggested to help with managing the impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on the Wikipedia online community. The third suggestion I would give to the Wikimedia Foundation would be to track and examine the impact and influence artificial intelligence has on Wikipedia and its users. By tracking and examining the impact and influence of artificial intelligence the Wikimedia Foundation would be able to see how Wikipedia has changed, see where their issues still are, and find out how they can improve Wikipedia for all users. For the Wikimedia Foundation to collect the most accurate and helpful information, they could track the impact of artificial intelligence through community engagement and by analyzing the change of trends. This could be done by collecting feedback from the user community on Wikipedia through surveys and by providing a channel where users can report issues regarding artificial intelligence. Along with tracking how the other changes they have made have helped with the use of artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. As well as comparing how their issues regarding artificial intelligence has improved to how they were originally. After analyzing the data, they collected the Wikimedia Foundation will be able to see if the changes they’ve made helped, if there is less inaccurate information, if Wikipedia is facing less threats, if there have been improvements in other areas, if there issues have worsened, and if they have any new issues regarding artificial intelligence use.

If the Wikimedia Foundation were to take my suggestions, I recommended to help manage the impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on the Wikipedia online community. I think Wikipedia would greatly benefit, the integrity of Wikipedia would be maintained, and the user experience would improve for all.