Jump to content

User:Ghorsefield/Phonological Rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT NONE OF THE BELOW INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THE PHONOLOGICAL RULE ARTICLE ITSELF. EVERYTHING INCLUDED HERE IS A NEWLY GENERATED PIECE OF INFORMATION. IN ESSENCE, THERE WERE NOT "CHANGES" MADE, ONLY ADDITIONS.

Peer Review Responses

[edit]

In terms of missing content, I think the information presented beneath the heading "Derivations" could use some additional filling in.

[edit]
  • I tend to agree, however striking a good balance between a simple introduction of an idea and an overly-technical example is quite thin in this case.

It might help to give an example of how we arrive at a correct and incorrect derivation - is it possible to show how this works in a real scenario?

[edit]
  • I must have missed this in my first read through but a great idea! I am not sure why I left it out.

It might help if specific page numbers were included

[edit]
  • Absolutely agree and have been fixed!

You might want to check the grammar on this sentence, though: "Given two rules, A and B, and we assume that both are equally valid rules, then their ordering will fall into one of the following categories..." perhaps replace the "and" with and "if"?)

[edit]
  • This was a difficult sentence for me to work through when writing it. I like "if" much better this time.

Thank you for your comments and suggestions!

Rule Ordering

[edit]

According to Jensen, when the application of one particular rule generates a phonological or morphological form that triggers an altogether different rule, resulting in an incorrect surface form, rule ordering is required.[1]

Types of Rule Ordering

[edit]

Given two rules, A and B, if we assume that both are equally valid rules, then their ordering will fall into one of the following categories:[2]

  • Feeding: the application of A creates the opportunity for B to apply.
  • Bleeding: the application of A prevents B from being able to apply.
  • Counterfeeding: the application of B creates the opportunity for A
  • Counterbleeding: the application of B prevents A from being able to apply.

Derivations

[edit]

When a distinct order between two rules is required, a derivation must be shown. The derivation must consist of a correct application of rule ordering that proves the phonetic representation to be possible as well as a counterexample that proves, given the opposite ordering, an incorrect phonetic representation will be generated.[1][3]

Example Derivation

[edit]

Below is an example of a derivation of rule ordering in Russian as presented by Jensen:[1] Given the following rules with rule 1 applying before rule 2:

  1. ___# (l-Deletion)[1]
  2. ___ # (Final Devoicing)[4]
Correct Derivation:[1]
[edit]
  1. /#greb+l#/ (Underlying Representation)
    • greb (Application of l-Deletion)
    • grep (Application of Final Devoicing)
  2. [grep*=] (Correct Phonetic Representation)
Incorrect Derivation:[1]
[edit]
  1. /#greb+l#/ (Underlying Representation)
    • ------ (Application of Final Devoicing)
    • greb (Application of l-Deletion)
  2. *[greb] (Incorrect Phonetic Representation)

Expanded Notation

[edit]

On their own, phonological rules are intended to be comprehensive statements about sound changes in a language. However, languages are rarely uniform in the way they change these sounds. For a formal analysis, it is often required to implement notation conventions in addition to those previously introduced to account for the variety of changes that occur as simply as possible.[5]

  • Subscripts: Indicate the number of occurrences of a phoneme type.[5]
    • indicates that or more consonants occur, where .
    • indicates that or more vowels occur, where .
  • Word Boundaries: indicate the left and right boundaries that, between them contain a complete string, represented with a hashtag symbol.[5] For example, the word "cat".
    • #cat#, the beginning and end hashtags indicate the respective beginning and end of the word "cat".
  • { } (Curly Braces): Indicate a logical-disjunction relationship of two expressions.[6] For example,
    • The two expressions, ABD and AED and be written with curly braces as:
      • , A is followed by either B or E and then D.
  • ( ) (Parenthesis): Indicate a logical-disjunction relationship of two expressions and an abbreviated version of the curly braces notation[5], while maintaining the same disjunctive relationship function. For example,
    • The two expressions, ABD and AD and be written with parentheses as:
      • , B is optionally permitted to come between A and D.
  • < > (Angled Brackets): Indicate a conditional relationship within a set[1][6]. For example, vowel harmony in Turkish,
    • __ , All vowels will take on the [+/- back] value of the vowel that precedes it, regardless of the number of intervening consonants. If a vowel is [+ high], it will also take on the [+/- round] value of the preceding vowel, regardless of the number of intervening consonants.

Bibliography

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Jensen, John T. (John Tillotson) (2004). Principles of Generative Phonology: An Introduction. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. p. 156. ISBN 978-90-272-7517-2. OCLC 769188823.
  2. ^ The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Goldsmith, John A., 1951-, Riggle, Jason., Yu, Alan C. L. (2nd ed ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2011. p. 41. ISBN 978-1-4443-4306-9. OCLC 758478759. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: others (link)
  3. ^ Chomsky, Noam. (1991). The sound pattern of English. Halle, Morris. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. p. 60. ISBN 0-262-03179-5. OCLC 778785348. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  4. ^ Jensen, John T. (John Tillotson) (2004). Principles of Generative Phonology: An Introduction. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. p. 116. ISBN 978-90-272-7517-2. OCLC 769188823.
  5. ^ a b c d Chomsky, Noam. (1991). The Sound Pattern of English. Halle, Morris. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. pp. 61, 367. ISBN 0-262-03179-5. OCLC 778785348. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  6. ^ a b Chomsky, Noam. (1991). The sound pattern of English. Halle, Morris. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. p. 77. ISBN 0-262-03179-5. OCLC 778785348. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)