User:Ghorsefield/Phonological Rule
IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD THAT NONE OF THE BELOW INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THE PHONOLOGICAL RULE ARTICLE ITSELF. EVERYTHING INCLUDED HERE IS A NEWLY GENERATED PIECE OF INFORMATION. IN ESSENCE, THERE WERE NOT "CHANGES" MADE, ONLY ADDITIONS.
Peer Review Responses
[edit]In terms of missing content, I think the information presented beneath the heading "Derivations" could use some additional filling in.
[edit]- I tend to agree, however striking a good balance between a simple introduction of an idea and an overly-technical example is quite thin in this case.
It might help to give an example of how we arrive at a correct and incorrect derivation - is it possible to show how this works in a real scenario?
[edit]- I must have missed this in my first read through but a great idea! I am not sure why I left it out.
It might help if specific page numbers were included
[edit]- Absolutely agree and have been fixed!
You might want to check the grammar on this sentence, though: "Given two rules, A and B, and we assume that both are equally valid rules, then their ordering will fall into one of the following categories..." perhaps replace the "and" with and "if"?)
[edit]- This was a difficult sentence for me to work through when writing it. I like "if" much better this time.
Thank you for your comments and suggestions!
Rule Ordering
[edit]According to Jensen, when the application of one particular rule generates a phonological or morphological form that triggers an altogether different rule, resulting in an incorrect surface form, rule ordering is required.[1]
Types of Rule Ordering
[edit]Given two rules, A and B, if we assume that both are equally valid rules, then their ordering will fall into one of the following categories:[2]
- Feeding: the application of A creates the opportunity for B to apply.
- Bleeding: the application of A prevents B from being able to apply.
- Counterfeeding: the application of B creates the opportunity for A
- Counterbleeding: the application of B prevents A from being able to apply.
Derivations
[edit]When a distinct order between two rules is required, a derivation must be shown. The derivation must consist of a correct application of rule ordering that proves the phonetic representation to be possible as well as a counterexample that proves, given the opposite ordering, an incorrect phonetic representation will be generated.[1][3]
Example Derivation
[edit]Below is an example of a derivation of rule ordering in Russian as presented by Jensen:[1] Given the following rules with rule 1 applying before rule 2:
- /#greb+l#/ (Underlying Representation)
- greb (Application of l-Deletion)
- grep (Application of Final Devoicing)
- [grep*=] (Correct Phonetic Representation)
- /#greb+l#/ (Underlying Representation)
- ------ (Application of Final Devoicing)
- greb (Application of l-Deletion)
- *[greb] (Incorrect Phonetic Representation)
Expanded Notation
[edit]On their own, phonological rules are intended to be comprehensive statements about sound changes in a language. However, languages are rarely uniform in the way they change these sounds. For a formal analysis, it is often required to implement notation conventions in addition to those previously introduced to account for the variety of changes that occur as simply as possible.[5]
- Subscripts: Indicate the number of occurrences of a phoneme type.[5]
- indicates that or more consonants occur, where .
- indicates that or more vowels occur, where .
- Word Boundaries: indicate the left and right boundaries that, between them contain a complete string, represented with a hashtag symbol.[5] For example, the word "cat".
- #cat#, the beginning and end hashtags indicate the respective beginning and end of the word "cat".
- { } (Curly Braces): Indicate a logical-disjunction relationship of two expressions.[6] For example,
- The two expressions, ABD and AED and be written with curly braces as:
- , A is followed by either B or E and then D.
- The two expressions, ABD and AED and be written with curly braces as:
- ( ) (Parenthesis): Indicate a logical-disjunction relationship of two expressions and an abbreviated version of the curly braces notation[5], while maintaining the same disjunctive relationship function. For example,
- The two expressions, ABD and AD and be written with parentheses as:
- , B is optionally permitted to come between A and D.
- The two expressions, ABD and AD and be written with parentheses as:
- < > (Angled Brackets): Indicate a conditional relationship within a set[1][6]. For example, vowel harmony in Turkish,
- __ , All vowels will take on the [+/- back] value of the vowel that precedes it, regardless of the number of intervening consonants. If a vowel is [+ high], it will also take on the [+/- round] value of the preceding vowel, regardless of the number of intervening consonants.
Bibliography
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g Jensen, John T. (John Tillotson) (2004). Principles of Generative Phonology: An Introduction. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. p. 156. ISBN 978-90-272-7517-2. OCLC 769188823.
- ^ The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Goldsmith, John A., 1951-, Riggle, Jason., Yu, Alan C. L. (2nd ed ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2011. p. 41. ISBN 978-1-4443-4306-9. OCLC 758478759.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help)CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ Chomsky, Noam. (1991). The sound pattern of English. Halle, Morris. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. p. 60. ISBN 0-262-03179-5. OCLC 778785348.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help) - ^ Jensen, John T. (John Tillotson) (2004). Principles of Generative Phonology: An Introduction. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. p. 116. ISBN 978-90-272-7517-2. OCLC 769188823.
- ^ a b c d Chomsky, Noam. (1991). The Sound Pattern of English. Halle, Morris. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. pp. 61, 367. ISBN 0-262-03179-5. OCLC 778785348.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b Chomsky, Noam. (1991). The sound pattern of English. Halle, Morris. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. p. 77. ISBN 0-262-03179-5. OCLC 778785348.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help)