User:Gaby Bars/sandbox
Submission declined on 24 November 2024 by TechnoSquirrel69 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Deborah Slater: A Choreographer of Paradoxes
When you first encounter the body of work created by Deborah Slater, you might find yourself puzzled, intrigued, and perhaps even a bit overwhelmed. How, you wonder, can one artist weave together such an array of seemingly disparate elements? Dance and theater, multimedia and spoken word, science and poetry - all coalescing into performances that are "visually stunning" and "thought-provoking."
You pore over descriptions of her pieces: "The Sleepwatchers," inspired by a Stanford sleep specialist's research; "inCIVILITY," a three-part exploration of social discord; "Line of Beauty," a meditation on the intersection of art and mathematics. Each work seems to spring from a wellspring of curiosity that knows no bounds, a mind that sees connections where others see only divides.
But when you see Deborah Slater in person, suddenly it all makes sense.
You realize that Slater herself is a living embodiment of the paradoxes her work explores. She's an artist with the soul of a researcher, a choreographer who thinks like a philosopher. For over three decades, she has been turning Studio 210 in San Francisco's Mission District into a laboratory of human expression, where dancers become conduits for complex ideas, and movement becomes a language to articulate the ineffable.
In Slater's presence, you understand that her work isn't just about creating beautiful dances or telling compelling stories. It's about using the human body as a tool to interrogate the world around us, to make sense of the chaos of existence. Her pieces are not mere performances; they're investigations into the human condition, conducted through the medium of dance.
As you watch her interact with her dancers or explain her latest project, you're struck by the realization that Deborah Slater doesn't just create art - she lives it. Her life and her work are inseparable, each informing and enriching the other in an endless feedback loop of creativity and exploration.
And suddenly, the question of "how?" transforms into a statement of awe. This is how. This is what happens when an artist refuses to be constrained by boundaries when curiosity is allowed to run wild, and when the body becomes a canvas for the mind's most profound inquiries.
In the end, you leave your encounter with Deborah Slater feeling not just enlightened, but inspired. For in her, you've seen a glimpse of what it means to truly live as an artist - always questioning, always creating, always pushing the boundaries of what's possible in the realm of human expression.