User:GB fan/Dashboard
 | This user is the owner of one other Wikipedia account in a manner permitted by policy and it is registered with the arbitration committee. |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 106.205.152.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- 219.79.208.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- 180.254.255.37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Pancasila Youth was changed by 180.254.255.37 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933004 on 2024-09-08T17:56:43+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]154.115.221.0/22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent Disruptive Editing 2601:282:4700:272:4998:7E09:2EA:75FD (talk) 17:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kvrk20official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Clinton Yours (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 11:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- PalestineLives4EverFlores (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mrskibidibiden (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2fistedhistory (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "fisted" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Haz que Estados Unidos vuelva a ser grande (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- SkibidiSpiderman808 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) DISRUPTNAME. The sooner this ‘Skib’ whatever meme drops dead, the better… DISRUPTNAME case helped by their existing 2 warnings. MM (Give me info.) (Victories) 10:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Looks to be headed towards indefblock for vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Continued editwarring on infobox image, open discussion on talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- If we full-protect it, it will mean that when that full protection expires all protection will end as it is not currently possible to layer two levels of protection. I can set a W-Ping to reset it, but this will likely mean there will be some period where the article is completely unprotected. Would you be OK with this possibiility? Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinate semi-protection: The page is already protected until 2122, which does not make any sense to protect a page for 100 years only for it to not be protected when that 100 years has passed. I think an Indefinate semi protection would be best. 142.114.181.79 (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined I'm deferring to what Firefangledfeathers wrote in the log, that there is no practical difference here. Since none of us are likely to be alive (at least not in our present form) when protection expires, and further I really doubt there will be an appetite for actively disrupting this article in the early 22nd century, I don't think we need decide this now. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A user with a red nickname constantly deletes information from the source, adding information without a source Dushnilkin (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. High risk page. Protection requested as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. since one of the sock accounts is autoconfirmed. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant addition of unsourced content by several IPs and unconfirmed users. CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. NumberjacksFan2024 (talk) 09:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA from User:Yawners' Cleaner et al., and please hide recent revisions from socks User:PowerMinersFan and User:Toa Mahri Kongu. Wikishovel (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And nonsense revision deleted. Johnuniq (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives vandalism only edits. Rarely receives legitimate contributions. DaHuzyBru (talk) 10:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent long term disruption. IP range may merit scrutiny. 2601:19E:4100:710:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Disruptive edits By IP Address. Gunther : Talk 12:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There is an ongoing issue with vandalism on Circassian-related articles, where an individual is consistently removing content related to religions other than Islam, despite the presence of reliable sources. This user is evading detection by using different IP addresses and has been banned on some occasions, but continues to disrupt the articles.
The vandalism is not only removing relevant information but also undermining the neutrality and accuracy of the articles. I request that the Circassian-related articles be protected to prevent further disruption and ensure the integrity of the content.
I believe this measure is necessary to maintain the quality and reliability of the articles and to prevent further disruption. Thank you for considering this request. Flux500 (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long-term IP vandalism and removal of sourced content. Skitash (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 13:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism going on since late 2023. CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 20:29, 7 September 2024. Panian513 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA readdition of long-winded unsourced POV commentary by several socks today alone. Wikishovel (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: CTOPS Israel-Palestine. Borgenland (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consider long-term protection under arbitration enforcement for WP:ARBAP2. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of HoY Piermark. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: 8 years after the start of their hoax (various IPs) :
- Earliest [1]
- Then added and deleted (mostly in, not out) for 3+ years until here
- Recent resumption [2]
- Latest
Although maybe "not enough recent disruption", they will not stop (and I don't want to play anymore)
- See 2020 advice Talk:Panela#Repeated inclusion of fanciful tale from Nick Moyes
Over to someone else now. 175.39.65.201 (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. At least 8 previous protections and vandalism has continued. That’s enough! 2603:8080:D03:89D4:A8F9:D254:9C47:7D12 (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Incessant edit-warring between User:GustavoCza and User:Rodericksilly. (The back-and-forth at Chris Martin could also maybe deserve a look, although they seem to have moved on from that one) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This was the page's last version before Rodericksilly started to edit war. Please be sure to restore it before putting up the protection. As it's the version that remained stable for months without interruption. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 17:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- As for the Chris Martin page, Rodericksilly insisted on a non-existing guideline and used WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to support it while my version is because I want the article to have a better division between paragraphs, also separating them between biography and achievements. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This user wants inappropriate editorializing language throughout articles which I have seen removed from other articles. All I have done is remove it. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- To both of you: This is very much not the place to argue about who is right. You can go to the talk page if you want to constructively discuss it, but the WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality needs to stop from both sides. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This user wants inappropriate editorializing language throughout articles which I have seen removed from other articles. All I have done is remove it. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- This doesn't need protection, so much as a round of blocks for for all involved. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm more than happy to not get involved in anything else if the articles get restored to before Rodericksilly began to act like I'm a terrible editor who does everything wrong. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 17:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Create protection is no longer required because the page will be redirected to Royal Match. The company is not notable enough for its own article, but is best known for its creation of the game. This is the result of an AFC/R request. Original administrator has not been active since April, and a timely response is unlikely. Garsh (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Protected for over a decade. However, both of the page protectors are likely inactive. Consider downgrading protection level and set a time limit?102.106.191.176 (talk)
Question: Agree the disruption that led to the AfD being protected has long since ceased. But curious why anyone would need to edit this closed AFD from 2011. The deleted article title (VIBES FM Hamburg) is not protected so is theoretically available for recreation if the subject has since become notable. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment: There's no reason to edit it, so why unprotect it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me ask you this then: why won't you at least let EC users fix Linter Errors in case if they notice any?102.106.191.176 (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Does it have any? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sumanuil It's clean from all lint* error types that we regularly fix and I don't see any reason to need to edit that page for lint reasons.
- * The one "issue" that you'll see listed there in the lint info, "night-mode-unaware-background-color", is more a tracking category than a lint error, and it is predominantly being left alone by the experienced delinting editors since we don't really agree with WMF for it's classification as lint, and since the issues are not well defined with a high rate of false flags. Until then, those issues are to be ignored. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting reducing protection level of the page from extended confirmed to Semi-protection. Since the candidate lists is incomplete, and election issues and party campaigns sections are completely empty, more editors are needed to update the article. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... (date of death is updated to 30/11/2024) . Jamesington (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: For which one? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 11 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 18 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Requesting autopatrolled for Chaotic Enby. Trusted user who already has NPP rights, articles are consistently well-written and well-sourced. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I just want to have a way to easily merge duplicate refs. I make that mistake a lot. Panini! • 🥪 12:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
my account has existed for 4 days and I have made 10 edits but my account is yet to be autoconfirmed. Arthur Vritra (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
I have organized two edit-a-thons in the past for WP:LABOR and will organize a third one soon in October. I am exploring running several in-person edit-a-thons in person at labor related conferences this year so this perm would be useful. In addition, I am advocating for English Wikipedia to enable Meta:CampaignEvents here, which ideally would also make use of this existing permission. See the discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Enable_Meta:CampaignEvents_feature_on_this_Wiki ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Jattlife121 (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Good day. I previously requested this permission but was declined due to lack of editing time on this account (I worked on an IP previously but have no way to prove this). At the risk of appearing too eager for this permission, I am requesting it again as I now have lengthier editing experience. I have demonstrated experience in AfC, AfD, CSD, draftification, and article creation. I also maintain rollbacker and pending change permissions. I believe I can be help bring down the NPP backlog and have the experience and policy understanding that is necessary to do so accurately. Garsh (talk) 01:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I have been editing since 2005 with over 15,000 edits without incident. I am requesting this permission so I am able to perform round robin moves when necessary. I am also open to assisting at WP:RM. James (talk/contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm 2RDD. With over a thousand edits and experience in maintaining article quality, I'm eager to help with page moves. I understand the importance of accurate titles and want to assist in keeping our namespace organized. I've reviewed the page move guidelines and am familiar with the process. Granting me Page Mover rights would allow me to efficiently rename pages, reducing the workload for administrators. Thanks for considering my request! 2RDD (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello! I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes. I want to become a pending changes reviewer. ZeetBaralWiki 15:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
I edit AusPol pages, and I'd like to be able to approve edits made to them :) No stress if I need more of a track record of edits - I totally understand. Jy Sandford (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello! I request for the permission - Rollback. ZeetBaralWiki 15:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello to anyone concerned. I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism. Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
I believe I'm experienced enough to have this right. OhHaiMark (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi everyone, I'm 2RDD. I've been editing Wikipedia for a year now and have made over a thousand edits. I'm passionate about maintaining article quality and combating vandalism. I believe Rollbacker rights would help me make a bigger impact. I'm eager to take on this responsibility and contribute to our community's mission. Thanks for considering my request! Best, 2RDD (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
|