User:Ereed23/Battle of Ringgold Gap/Dcb1986 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? Ereed23
- Link to draft you're reviewing: Battle of Ringgold Gap
Lead evaluation
[edit]The lead reflects new content, and is fairly concise. The editor removed some unnecessary material and did some copy editing to make it sound better. It could use a bit more elaboration in regards to the articles major sections.
Content evaluation
[edit]The new added content is relevant to the topic, and is up to date. It does a good job of describing the order of battle.
Tone and Balance evaluation
[edit]The tone is neutral, and appears fairly balanced, with no attempts to persuade the reader to a particular position.
Sources and References evaluation
[edit]This article does not lack for sources, and the ones that I clicked on all worked, and they appeared to be thorough.
Organization evaluation
[edit]It is fairly well-written and is concise and easy to read. I didn't notice any blatant grammatical errors, and it looked to be well organized.
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]I think the images are fairly detailed, it looked like they existed prior to the editor working on the project. I think the current ones do a good job of illustrating the subject, and aren't too excessive.
For New Articles Only
[edit]- N/A
Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- How can the content added be improved?
Overall evaluation
[edit]I think the intro could be expanded a bit, based on the review criteria. The section about the Opposing Forces was really interesting and detailed, and I think the section about the battle was a big improvement over the previous content.