User:Dyy122dyy/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: (Los Angeles Lakers)
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This is my favorite basketball team.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
The lead consicesly and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead introduces the meaning and history of Lakers.
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
All the contents are relevant to the topic. Most of the content is up-to-date, but some still needs modification. There no signs of another great player's join -- Lebron James. It is needed to be write down in the content.
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Is the content up-to-date?
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
The article is neutral. There are no bias, overrepresented, or underrepresented in the article.
- Is the article neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
Most of the facts found in the article with a footnote does not come from a reliable journal or article. The reference list does come from reliable journal or book. The sources are thorough. The notes section is current but needed more current reference list, most of the references are 20 years old. There are links in the foot note section that does not work anymore.
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- The article is well written. There is no obvious grammar or spelling errors. The article is broken down into logical sections that is easy for reader to find the information they need.
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
The article include image that enhances the understanding of the topic. Images are well-captioned. All images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. Images are laid out in a visually appealing way.
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- The talk page is closely related to the topic and there is no difference from what we have talked in class.
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
The overall status of article is great. The content is detailed. However, some more news need to be updated. The article in total is well-developed.
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: