User:Dronebogus/Why Wikipedia won out over Citizendium

Note the conspicuous lack of Futanari nudity.

In 2007 a fat 0% of articles on Citzendium were about futanari

Wikipedia is strict, but you automatically have the right to put pictures of naked futanaris on relevant articles. English Wikipedia has had an article on Futanari since 2003 and Commons has had naked Futanaris available for it since 2010

Citizendium has no naked futanaris and you practically have to hand over your debit card, left kidney, and social security number to propose correcting a typo.

It remains to be seen whether Citizendium will ever feature pictures of clothed Futanaris (though in their defense Wikipedia didn’t have any either until 2022).

Futanari nudity and other online encyclopedias

Infogalactic has naked Futanaris despite being a far-rightwing site that would be expected to treat such things as “degenerate”. However, this is not particularly surprising as Infogalactic is just a very, very lightly edited fork of Wikipedia that serves primarily as a vanity project for alt-rightist author Theodore “Vox Day” Beale where most of the alterations are limited to copy editing, rewriting contentious political articles to include gratuitous far-right attack content, or creating articles of nothing but gratuitous far-right attack content. (We can only hope that the unexpected exposure to cute anime girls with penises engaged in tender lovemaking will dissuade Infogalactic’s target audience from the path of transphobic, homophobic extremism)