I am currently spending down-time learning about the FIVE PILLARS of Wikipedia. For one to spend time within the pillars, one must understand what they mean, AND how the spirit of what those pillars stand for are enforced by those who would enforce them.. The fundamental principles by which Wikipedia operates are summarized in the form of five "pillars":
|
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. It incorporates elements of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, an experiment in anarchy or democracy, an indiscriminate collection of information, or a web directory. It is not a dictionary, newspaper, or a collection of source documents; that kind of content should be contributed instead to the Wikimedia sister projects.
|
|
|
Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. We strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view, presenting each point of view accurately and in context, and not presenting any point of view as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy: unreferenced material may be removed, so please provide references. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong here. That means citing verifiable, authoritative sources, especially on controversial topics and when the subject is a living person. When conflict arises over neutrality, discuss details on the talk page, and follow dispute resolution.
|
|
|
Wikipedia is free content that anyone can edit and distribute. Respect copyright laws, and do not plagiarize your sources. Non-free content is allowed under fair use, but please strive to find free alternatives to any media or content that you wish to add to Wikipedia. Since all your contributions are freely licensed to the public, no editor owns any article; all of your contributions can and will be mercilessly edited and redistributed.
|
|
|
Wikipedians should interact in a respectful and civil manner. Respect and be polite to your fellow Wikipedians, even when you disagree. Apply Wikipedia etiquette, and avoid personal attacks. Find consensus, avoid edit wars, and remember that there are 6,907,598 articles on the English Wikipedia to work on and discuss. Act in good faith, never disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, and assume good faith on the part of others. Be open and welcoming.
|
|
|
Wikipedia does not have firm rules. Rules on Wikipedia are not carved in stone, and the spirit of the rule trumps the letter of the rule. Be bold (but not reckless) in updating articles and do not worry about making mistakes. Your efforts do not need to be perfect; prior versions are saved, so no damage is irreparable.
|
SURE! | This~User~Will~Help~If~Possible! |
For a long time, I spent my free time goofing off in/on various forums as a user/contributor ~ but recently I realized that I was wasting my time in these places. At Wikipedia, one can be proud of contributing to the knowledge of others, and I do feel proud to contribute.
Contributing here can be rewarding AND a challenge of working with others. One can learn much about him/herself in the efforts of collaboration.
'I am hopeful (after putting more effort in) that I might be accepted into the ranks of trusted Janitors who do so much here. For now, I want to continue learning how to get around and also find a place that I can be of help. My interests are pretty diverse, so settling in to one thing might be a little tough..
'
| This user knows too much. |
| This user knows too much. |
| This user knows too much. |
| This user knows too much. |
..with several interests including Photography
| This user takes photographs with Nikon equipment |
, Computing
, Real Estate,
Electronics, Health
and Law
| This user is an aspiring Lawyer |
,
I've spent countless hours over time researching and learning, (which I NEVER did in School!). Computers and the Internet have changed my life from the standpoint of how information is transmitted to the world. Just 20 years ago, an individual would have go to the library to research a subject of interest, and would HAVE to trust their doctor or lawyer (for example) due to limited resources. Now there is no reason for an individual to be at an informational disadvantage ~ and being one's own advocate is a matter of choice as opposed to a matter of "fact"! The Internet, Wikipedia and a WWW of resources have made it possible for nearly anyone to be learned and armed with knowledge. At the top of my list of interests is Health-related topics, but I'm not a doctor (some of my friends/family think so!)
I've contributed a great deal to the article "vasectomy", as my own research a few years ago when having the procedure done led me to this site, and I found it to be only moderately helpful. As well, I've found that the "readability" of these articles was not optimal, IMHO. Therefore, I've tried to reach a wider audience by making syntax adjustments, and description adjustments that would be more helpful to all who are interested in these subjects.
| This user uses Wikipedia as a primary point of reference. |
RTFM | This user believes that you should RTFM before asking questions. |
| This user uses Google as a primary search engine. |
G | This user will use Google before asking dumb questions. |
its | This user understands the difference between its (of it) and it's (it is or it has). |
’s | Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice. |
| This user has posted to Usenet newsgroups. |