User:D3032447367/Bell Let's Talk/AAnonymous Bear Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
- the Bell Let's Talk movement, done by my peer in class: D3032447367, Mary Mijares
- Link to draft you're reviewing: Bell Let's Talk#2020
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
Lead evaluation
[edit]Yes the lead has new content telling when the movement started in 2010 and how social media and hashtags were used in 2018. The first line of the lead gives a definition of what the Bell let's talk movement is, and who created the movement. I feel that the lead is to the point, it is not too long where it bores the reader and has enough information to tell the reader how it started, and the actions that took place for the movement to grow.
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- Is the content added up-to-date?
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Content evaluation
[edit]The content is relevant and dates from the year the movement started all the way to 2020. However one thing that I did find to not have information on the bio description movement where it talks about the next event, which is dated January 29, 2020, and in the 2020 content that date is not talked about, nor is the event that happened.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral?
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The tone of the content is neutral giving the reader facts and important events that have happened during the movement. Even though wikipedia flagged the page to read like an advertisement, I don't agree. The page reads informative and is detailed about what has happened from the year 2011 to 2020, in no way does the article read to be a promotion, however I do get a blog feeling from the article. It reads as a blog because of the timeline, however I find the timeline to be informative.
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Wikipedia has flagged this article to heavily rely on references to primary sources. Which is a problem because wikipedia has strict rules on how to use primary sources, such as not basing an entire article on primary sources. Even though the sources reflect the topic and provide information, the sources are from people directly involved with the organization giving bias to the page. Within this page the sources are recent and work.
Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation
[edit]This page gives a clear visual of what Bell Let's Talk is, the methods that were used to spread the word of the movement, the results dating from 2011 to 2020, and the criticism of this movement. After reading the article, I did not come across any grammatical or spelling errors. The content of under results and major contributions gives a well organized section giving the major points of what happened throughout the movement.
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]The article uses images to enhance the topic such as putting a picture of a person wearing a hat with the Bell Let's Talk movement, as a promotion. Overall, the article gives a clear and concise explanation of each image. However, I do feel that an image of Clara Hudgens speaking at a Bell Let's Talk movement could enhance the visual content of the page.