User:Collect/ACE2019
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
- Ought Arbitrators who have been personally involved in any way concerning the facts of a case recuse themselves from any related cases?
- Ought the persons named in a case be given sufficient time to answer charges made by others, rather than have each be given the same time limits?
- When an arbitrator proffers specific evidence on their own, ought the accused be permitted to actually reply to such "new evidence" as though it were timely presented, with the same time allowed for such a response?
My ratings are in regard to the answers given to these questions, and only these questions and answers. I would note that I have no "grudge lists" at any time, and never have. And I have opposed RfAs for a person and then supported the same person in ACE - I honestly treat every encounter as though it were my first.
Net results (not necessarily in alphabetical order
A Maxim, Hawkeye7, Brady, LaserBrain, Kudpung
B Xeno, Llywrch, NYB, TRM, DavidFuchs, SoWhy, RichWales, WTT, BarKeep, Thryduulf
C DGG, Enterprisey, Beeblebrox, Gadfium, Casliber
Fail Calidum (no answers), KrakatoaKatie, Isarra.
An above-average group, in fact, overall.