User:Colindresj/Corrigedora (novel)/NoahMullens Peer Review
Appearance
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
- Colindresj
- Link to draft you're reviewing:
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
- Yes
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Make the first word the title
- Mention more precisely the content, not just the setting (Kentucky)
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Mention briefly the critical response to the novel
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- No
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- Break down then 3rd sentence
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- It is all relevant
- Is the content added up-to-date?
- The only source is the novel so I do not know, but I think so
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- Summary is missing
- Make the subheadings under Themes a smaller font (I think?)
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
Only really applicable to Themes section
- Is the content added neutral?
- Yes, I would just add sources under themes to back analysis
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- All the themes have the same amount of work done, so no.
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- No, especially for words in "quotes"
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- The only source is the novel, so not yet
- Are the sources current?
- The only source is the novel, so no
- Check a few links. Do they work?
- The two links work, so yes
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Yes, some sentences need to be rewritten for clarity or to be broken down, but it is mostly all clear
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- No
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes, maybe critical response can also account for accolades, awards, or reception
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- No images
- Are images well-captioned?
- No images
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- N/A
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- N/A
Images and media evaluation
[edit]For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- No, there is only one sources
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- There is only one source
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Yes, it follows the pattern of most pages that are about specific novels
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
- Yes, it will link to the author's page
New Article Evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- Yes, it will largely improve information on the novel by moving it form a blurb in the authors page to an individual page
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- The writing style, the information, the structure
- How can the content added be improved?
- Filling it out, adding more sources