Jump to content

User:ClueBot III/Detailed Indices/Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Order Header Start Date End Date Comments Size Archive
1 Fringe theory pushed and mainstream view marginalized 2017-02-11 20:10 2017-02-13 17:05 10 7137 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
2 Article on "Tiger Forces" relies heavily on bias, non-verifiable source 2017-02-12 02:49 2017-02-13 17:22 3 2636 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
3 limiting more yellow Journalism 2017-02-10 10:30 2017-02-13 17:46 28 11637 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
4 Have we boycotted a mainstream news outlet before? 2017-02-09 16:23 2017-02-13 18:11 35 15443 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
5 Material sourced to Daily Mail in "St Paul's Survives" 2017-02-09 09:19 2017-02-13 22:14 20 10395 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
6 Public perception OF Daily Mail RfC 2017-02-09 22:54 2017-02-14 03:40 21 9524 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
7 Appropriate referencing for steel-reinforced straw men made by an ice cream manufacturer 2017-02-13 22:23 2017-02-14 11:06 3 1856 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
8 Forbes Articles 2017-02-14 20:11 2017-02-15 17:24 5 4383 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
9 Is Google Maps a reliable source for boundaries of a neighborhood? 2017-02-14 02:38 2017-02-15 19:46 17 13294 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
10 IJR.com / "Independent Journal Review" 2017-02-15 01:17 2017-02-15 19:59 12 9091 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
11 Donald Trump–Russia dossier 2017-02-14 23:18 2017-02-15 23:25 5 2873 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
12 Daily Mail vs Huffington Post 2017-02-11 23:34 2017-02-16 13:41 37 25127 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
13 Article Bio website as a source 2017-02-14 03:07 2017-02-16 22:50 5 2754 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
14 Source 2017-02-16 22:27 2017-02-16 22:59 4 1685 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
15 symposium paper as a source 2017-02-17 01:06 2017-02-17 01:06 1 415 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
16 Basriat 2017-02-17 13:09 2017-02-17 14:24 4 2485 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
17 How has Daily Mail affected accuracy of Wikipedia articles? 2017-02-14 18:25 2017-02-17 18:40 24 14547 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
18 Abebe Bikila: Accident 2017-02-18 06:41 2017-02-18 06:41 1 2709 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
19 Article published by David Publishing 2017-02-18 21:33 2017-02-18 21:33 1 1795 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
20 "location" in cite news 2017-02-19 00:52 2017-02-19 11:24 5 4294 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
21 Sources regarding Tsamiko and Osman Taka dances. Do they meet Wikipedia criteria for reliability ? 2017-02-19 21:11 2017-02-19 21:11 1 2370 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
22 Changing a bizarre Wiki rule on sourcing 2017-02-27 15:18 2017-02-27 17:11 25 12853 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
23 Casualty Statistics: Participation in hostilities irrelevant? 2017-02-22 09:36 2017-02-22 10:41 5 4192 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
24 Citation included for BLUE material that may also include COPYVIOs? 2017-02-22 07:54 2017-02-22 12:23 2 2608 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
25 paleofuture.gizmodo.com in Napoleon Hill 2017-02-15 22:29 2017-02-22 18:57 38 25117 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
26 journeymart.com 2017-02-22 12:58 2017-02-22 20:46 4 1834 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
27 Mondoweiss 2017-02-22 21:12 2017-02-22 21:24 4 1988 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
28 Google News Search seems less useful for finding reliable sources. 2017-02-18 20:31 2017-02-23 00:41 4 2303 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
29 Institute for Legal Reform claims to support statement that particular lawyers "regularly manipulate litigation" etc. 2017-02-22 22:53 2017-02-23 14:52 3 1514 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
30 Daily Mail (again- sorry!) 2017-02-23 13:12 2017-02-23 17:52 5 2174 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
31 Can we have clearer guidance on what sort of sourcing from the Mail is and isn't OK? 2017-02-10 18:56 2017-02-23 20:42 22 21066 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
32 The Spinoff 2017-02-23 01:12 2017-02-24 02:07 4 3588 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
33 Labeling non-religious writers as part of an occult belief system 2017-02-22 21:48 2017-02-24 04:34 13 14006 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
34 Sources provided for The Russian Bride 2017-02-19 23:34 2017-02-25 10:41 8 5187 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
35 The Forward 2017-02-25 15:37 2017-02-25 20:04 2 2397 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
36 Symposium paper as a source 2017-02-24 03:00 2017-02-26 16:10 3 1094 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
37 Dear Pot. O.K. I admit it. I am black. Signed, Kettle. 2017-02-27 03:06 2017-02-27 03:06 1 705 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
38 Shukan Shincho 2017-02-28 03:59 2017-02-28 03:59 1 404 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
39 Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS? 2017-02-23 21:05 2017-02-28 15:16 4 2832 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS?|Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221]]