User:Civilizededucation

:HELLO friends. Warm welcome. Please use my talk page to inform me about any posts that you may want me to see, just keep the issues where they belong. I try to be as clear and concise as possible on all issues, and am trying to familiarize myself with WP:CIVIL and other Wiki policies and guidelines. I also want to keep focus only on building a good encyclopedia.

The thing I have learned on Wikipedia is that your peace of mind is more important than....whatever. Take it easy..... and you can enjoy.

The electricity supply in my area is rather erratic. Please excuse if I unexpectedly disappear from some activities in which I am involved.

I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.

–Jimmy Wales ^[1]^[2]^[3]

Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

In Thought du Jour Harold Geneen has stated:^[4]

The reliability of the person giving you the facts is as important as the facts themselves. Keep in mind that facts are seldom facts, but what people think are facts, heavily tinged with assumptions.

Founding principles of Wikipedia

Picture of the day

Thecacera pennigera, also known as the winged thecacera, is a species of sea slug in the family Polyceridae. It has a cosmopolitan distribution, being found in temperate waters on either side of the North Atlantic Ocean, in the Mediterranean Sea, around South and West Africa, Brazil, Japan, Korea, Pakistan and more recently in Australia and New Zealand. There is a significant difference in colouring between Atlantic populations and Pacific specimens, however. Thecacera pennigera has a typical adult length between 15 millimetres (0.6 in) and 30 millimetres (1.2 in), featuring a short, wide head with two lateral flaps and two sheathed olfactory organs called rhinophores. The body is wedge shaped, being wide at the front and ending in a slender foot with a lateral keel on either side. The general colour of the body is translucent white and the upper side is covered with orange splotches and small black spots. Like other sea slugs, T. pennigera is a hermaphrodite with internal fertilisation and a mating mechanism whereby pairs of animals exchange packets of sperm. This T. pennigera was photographed in the Mar Piccolo of Taranto, Italy.Photograph credit: Roberto Strafella

Archive – More featured pictures...

This user is a
curmudgeon

This user enjoys watching pointless animations.

Burrito ergo sum

I fart, therefore I am.

This user is male, and as such, he would prefer to be addressed and/or referred to with masculine pronouns.

Tip of the day

Try to see it my way!

Frustrated by the comments, edits, and reverts of another user? Remember, behind that sig line is another human being, just like you! And just like you, that person wants to see his or her ideas come to life on Wikipedia.

If you feel yourself getting angry, hurt, or frustrated, explain yourself in a reasonable way and politely ask that others involved in the conversation do the same. But do not expect everyone to agree with you. Differences of background and opinion are part of what makes Wikipedia so great!

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Link farm and other knick knack

User:Civilizededucation/test

User:Civilizededucation/Sandbox

User:Civilizededucation/Sandbox2

User:Civilizededucation/stuffbox

Wikipedia:Plagiarism

Tips

Wikipedia:Tip of the day/October 19, 2006

Wikipedia:Template messages

Wikipedia:Writing better articles

Help:Wikitable

User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo

egl

special:Tags

HOW TO CITE

Template:Citation/core

Deletion of articles

WP:HOWTO

article Talk page templates

Wikipedia:Cheatsheet

Wikipedia:How to edit a page

Wikipedia:Article development

Wikipedia:Manual of Style

Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates

Template:Tmbox

Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace

Wikipedia:Userboxes

help HTML

WP:Images

Wikipedia:Finding images tutorial

Wikipedia:List of free online resources

Wikipedia:Smurrayinchester's signature tutorial

[[Category:Wikipedia features]

Help:Contents/Site map

Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight

Editing Help

To make a , [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]]
Magnus's Make Ref
Icons Cheatsheet
All-in-one Editing Guide All-in-one Editing Guide
Un-indenting or Outdenting
Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles/Documenting Your Sources
Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons

Tick

npp

pp

akt

References

^ Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.
^ http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html
^ Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo
^ Harold Geneen in his "Thought du Jour", cited by Michael Kesterton in The Globe and Mail on February 20, 2006 at page A14 in the Section of Social Studies, sub-section A daily miscellany of information.
^ "Manned Space Chronology: Apollo_11". spaceline.org. Retrieved 2008-02-06.
^ "Apollo Anniversary: Moon Landing "Inspired World"". nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 2008-02-06.

[1] Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

[2] ttp://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html

[3] Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo

[long-4] Harold Geneen in his "Thought du Jour", cited by Michael Kesterton in The Globe and Mail on February 20, 2006 at page A14 in the Section of Social Studies, sub-section A daily miscellany of information.

[5] "Manned Space Chronology: Apollo_11". spaceline.org. Retrieved 2008-02-06.

[6] "Apollo Anniversary: Moon Landing "Inspired World"". nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 2008-02-06.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]