User:Chip123456/CVUA

Below is some tasks I have set. Please answer the questions when you have spare time. I will use it to judge, as well as your other work, to see whether you are ready to graduate from the academy and request rollback at WP:PERM.

Tasks I

Read WP:VAND - done 13 August
Read WP:NOTVAND - done 13 August
Read WP:AGF - done 13 August
Read WP:WARN - done 14 August
Read WP:GAIV - done 14 August

- Good. You'll find these links very useful. Refer to them when you are stuck - they are a great resource.--Chip¹²³⁴⁵⁶ 13:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Task II

Please find 4 diffs of vandalism you have reverted. Explain why you thought it was appropriate to use your tools to revert it

If you need help with the table - tell me

Index	Article	Editor	Edit(s)	Revert	Response	Explanation
1 revert	Pocoyo	01234567890a	[1]	[2]	Level 1 vandalism warning on talk page, then Level 2 a few minutes later.	Language looks like kids messing around, so a simple warning might be enough. Added to watchlist. Y Well done for taking it upon yourself to add to you WL, smart move.--Chip¹²³⁴⁵⁶ 13:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
2	20th century	User:220.255.2.119	[3]	[4]	uw-vandal3 at talk page	long history of random vandalism from this address. edit history of 20th century shows several IP addresses from this subnet doing the same thing. Requested temporary semi-protection at WP:RPP, and added to watchlist. Y I don't think the page has been protected (yet, anyway) but the revert is accurate.--Chip¹²³⁴⁵⁶ 13:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
3	Sally Pearson	User:124.182.142.25	[5]	[6]	Level 2 and 3 warnings on user's talk page following repeated vandalism	Blatant deletions of big chunks of text, with random nonsense text added. Added article to watchlist. Y Agreed.--Chip¹²³⁴⁵⁶ 13:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
4	Bokaro Steel City	User:Mrinal.kumar.bokaro	[7]	[8]	Editor had already had warnings up to level 4 from ClueBot NG. I've reported editor at WP:AIV.	Possible that the editor was trying to trim down content that they was irrelevant, but after that many warnings the editor is either willfully vandalizing or needs some cooling-off time before attempting more edits.

Please find 3 diff of good faith edits you have reverted. Why were they good faith, not vandalism?

Index	Article	Editor	Edit	Revert	Response
1	Narang Mandi	User:Azhar.saeed.bhutta	[9]	[10]	Added a welcome to editor's page, as this was their first edit and probably doesn't know about WP:VERIFY and WP:NOTABILITY yet. There was also an existing section of similarly unreferenced entries with no WP article, so best to welcome with new editor info rather than warn in this case. Y Always good to leave the welcome note, with the welcome links. They are very helpful.--Chip¹²³⁴⁵⁶ 13:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
2	Doctor Who (1996 film)	User:Ricadomark	[11]	[12]	Added welcome to new user's page, with friendly "nothanks" template explaining about copyvio. Y --Chip¹²³⁴⁵⁶ 13:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
3	Article -	Editor -	Diff of edit -	Revert -	Respone -

Please find 3 correct reports you have made at WP:AIV
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]

Please find one failed report at AIV. Why did you think the user wasn't blocked? How will you use this in the future to help you report?

A user has blanked a wiki page. What do you check before reverting?

An IP address has just been unblocked after a block was given them for 24hrs because they vandalised. They, as soon as the block expires, have resumed vandalisng wikipedia, 3 times. Do you:

A - Give them a general note for unconstructive editing

B - Give them an only warning

C - Report them immediately to WP:AIV

Please find (if any) 1 report you have made at WP:RFPP, because there has been a lot of vandalism from several users/IP's on that page

Has a vandalising user/IP ever caused you any stress? If so, how did you handle it? Please state the user/IP name

Task III

Please go into recent changes to and revert vandalism for 10 - 15 minutes. Please show the diffs, show the warnings, and, if any, show reports

Please then revert 3 good faith edits. Show the diffs, and show any interaction you had with that user