User:Cesar Livermore/Evaluate an Article

Alternative Health Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: (link) Chiropractic
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I choose this article because I am interested in chiropractic and acupuncture health.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does.
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes it does.
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Think it is concise f

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, however, it included massage therapy.
Is the content up-to-date? Yes it is.
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Even do, massage therapy was not part of search, it was included in the article.

Is the article neutral? Yes.
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It is neutral.
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? It does give the reader something to think about.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
Are the sources current? Yes.
Check a few links. Do they work? There was are so many links (228), it works.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes. Its broken in sections includes philosophy, colleges and controversy.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, there is multiple pictures.
Are images well-captioned? Yes.
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? I clicked on some of then-but I am not sure.
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Unknown.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? I am not sure, how to rate it.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

What is the article's overall status? I think the status is good.
What are the article's strengths? The articles strengths exceptional, some are long explanations and some short explanations. Overall it has merit.
How can the article be improved? Th article could be, there is so much information do. I think the article is missing information of colleges of the United Kingdom. I know of a collge that open up and is not mentioned din the article.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Its complete and well developed.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~