User:CartoonDiablo/sandbox
Oh wow I just noticed I had a sandbox.
Dimmension | Compensation | Modification | Description |
---|---|---|---|
E | Low | Low | Primitive E |
E | Low | High | Suppressed E |
E | High | Low | Controlled E |
E | High | High | Repressed E |
I | Low | Low | Primitive I |
I | Low | High | Suppressed I |
I | High | Low | Controlled I |
I | High | High | Repressed I |
Regulated-Flexible Dimmension
Dimmension | Compensation | Modification | Description |
---|---|---|---|
F | Low | Low | Controlled F |
F | Low | High | Repressed F |
F | High | Low | Exploited F |
F | High | High | Modified F |
R | Low | Low | Modified R |
R | Low | High | Exploited R |
R | High | Low | Repressed R |
R | High | High | Controlled R |
Rank-Raglan Mythotype
[edit]The Rank-Raglan mythotype (sometimes called the mythic hero archetype) is a classification developed by Lord Raglan and later elaborated by Otto Rank and Alan Dundes that lists different cross-cultural traits of mythical heroes.[1] This mythotype has been prominently used in the modern Christ myth theory to argue against a historical Jesus.[2][3]
Methodology
[edit]As developed by Raglan and extended by Rank and Dundes, a figure is considered more of a mythical hero the more of these traits they hold (a point is added per trait).
- Mother is a royal virgin
- Father is a king
- Father related to mother
- Unusual conception
- Hero reputed to be son of god
- Attempt to kill hero as an infant, often by father or maternal grandfather
- Hero spirited away as a child
- Reared by foster parents in a far country
- No details of childhood
- Returns or goes to future kingdom
- Is victor over king, giant, dragon or beast
- Marries a princess (often daughter of predecessor)
- Becomes king
- For a time he reigns uneventfully
- He prescribes laws
- Later loses favor with gods or his subjects
- Driven from throne and city
- Meets with mysterious death
- Often at the top of a hill
- His children, if any, do not succeed him [i.e., does not found a dynasty]
- His body is not buried
- Nonetheless has one or more holy sepulchers or tombs
Listings
[edit]People have come up with different rankings using this list. Richard Carrier for instance created this list in his book, On The Historicity of Jesus:
Hero | Score | Notes |
---|---|---|
Oedipus | 21 | |
Theseus | 20 | |
Moses | 20 | |
Jesus | 20 | Is scored at the lowest at 14, as portrayed in the Gospel of Mark. |
Dionysus | 19 | |
Romulus | 18 | |
Perseus | 18 | |
Hercules | 17 | |
Bellerophon | 16 | |
Jason | 15 | |
Zeus | 15 | |
Osiris | 15 | |
Pelops | 13 | |
Asclepius | 12 | |
Joseph (son of Jacob) | 12 |
References
[edit]- ^ Lord Raglan. The Hero: A Study in Tradition, Myth and Drama by Lord Raglan, Dover Publications, 1936
- ^ Robert M. Price, 2011, The Christ Myth Theory and it's Problems p. 425, ISBN 978-1-57884-017-5
- ^ Richard Carrier, 2014, On The Historicity of Jesus
External links
[edit]- Lord' Raglan's Hero Pattern, Monmouth College
Analytic–Continental divide
[edit]The Analytic–Continental philosophical divide is a separation in philosophy which emerged in the 20th century.
Very Serious People
[edit]Very Serious People or Very Serious Person (VSP) is a sarcastically derogatory phrase given to pundits and legislators who are generally viewed as having respectable, conventional opinions but are actually wrong and foolish. The term has particularly been used and popularized by Paul Krugman, who says he may have borrowed it from blogger Atrios.[1] The term has been in use since at least 2006[2] and is generally used by liberal bloggers and opinion writers.[3] Kevin Drum said in 2009 that "one of the current favorite pastimes in the liberal blogosphere is to mock the Very Serious People who currently make up our foreign policy establishment."[3]
Origin and meaning
[edit]English literary critic G. K. Chesterton used the phrase sardonically (referring to playwright George Bernard Shaw) in his 1922 book The Well and the Shallows.[4] The phrase was used in its current political context by Atrios as early as October 23, 2006.[2] By 2007 it was in use by liberal bloggers Matt Stoller at MYDD,[5] Digby at Hullabaloo[6] and Kevin Drum at Washington Monthly.[3] Atrios defined it as "The idiotic assholes who rule us," in response to a video of Senator Alan Simpson with regards to the Bowles-Simpson Commission.[7] The phrase has been used by Paul Krugman to mean people that hold respected opinions but "keep demanding utterly foolish policies."[1]Chris Hayes in his book Twilight of the Elites has said Krugman uses the phrase against elite opinion.[8]
Steve Benen has summarized the phrase as follows:
The VSP is one of those Washington insiders that the political establishment respects and listens to, despite the fact that the person is (a) nearly always wrong; (b) habitually dishonest; or (c) both.[9]
Usage
[edit]This section possibly contains original research. (March 2013) |
It has been used by Paul Krugman to attack pundits that promote austerity.[10][11] It has also been used to describe pundits who hold opinions on foreign policy,[3] structural unemployment,[12] Bond vigilantes,[13] the proposed Paul Ryan Budget[3] and Occupy Wall Street.[14]
Pundits who have been called Very Serious People include New York Times columnists Thomas Friedman[3] and David Brooks.[10] Others include Carly Fiorina,[15] Kenneth Pollack,[3] Michael Ignatieff,[3] and Michael O'Hanlon.[3] Steve Benen has called Congressman Paul Ryan "the quintessential Very Serious Person."[9] In October 2012 Krugman dubbed the The Washington Post "VSP Central".[16]
Commenting on an analysis of the Italian election of February, 2013, Frederick Guy of the University of London[17] pointed out that the American economist Robert Waldmann used variations on "very serious person", including “the very eminent Eurocrat economist extremely serious person”, to mock the positions of certain political figures.[18]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Very Serious Question," Paul Krugman, February 12, 2012
- ^ a b Black, Duncan (October 23, 2006). "War, What is it Good For?". Eschaton. Retrieved January 13, 2013.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Very Serious People, Kevin Drum, The Washington Monthly, August 9, 2007 Cite error: The named reference "WM" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Chesterton, G. K. (January 30, 2007). The Well and the Shallows. Ignatius Press. p. 22. Retrieved March 4, 2013.
But the point is that flippancies of this sort are only used by a very serious person. Mr. Bernard Shaw is a very serious person.
- ^ Stoller, Matt (January 1, 2007). "Universal Health Care Run by Psychotics". MYDD. MYDD.com. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
- ^ Digby (May 18, 2007). "Rule 'O Law". Hullabaloo. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
- ^ "Very Serious People", Eschaton, June 18, 2010
- ^ Hayes, Chris (2012). Twilight of the Elites. p. 17.
- ^ a b The opposite of seriousness," Steve Benen, maddowblog, March 3, 2012
- ^ a b "The New York Times Sponsors Deficit Reduction Week", NYTimes eXaminer, April 17, 2012
- ^ "Paul Krugman: Austerity Is So Wrong!" The Daily Beast, May 6, 2012
- ^ "Structure of Excuses" Paul Krugman, New York Times, September 27, 2010
- ^ "Why The "Very Serious People" Have It All Wrong," Business Insider, June 2, 2011
- ^ "Occupy Wall Street Gets What the 'Very Serious People' Have Missed for 30 Years," CEPR, John Schmitt, October 6, 2011
- ^ "We're Doomed," Paul Krugman, New York Times, April 29, 2012
- ^ Paul Krugman, Flimflam Fever Goes VSP krugman.blogs.nytimes.com October 2, 2012
- ^ Filippetti, Andrea (2012-08-10). "Skills, social insurance, and changes in innovation investment after the onset of the financial crisis in Europe" (PDF). CIMR Research Working Paper Series. Centre for Innovation Management Research. Retrieved 2013-03-09.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); line feed character in|title=
at position 83 (help) - ^ Frederick, Guy (2013-02-27). "Italian election aftermath: Very Serious People vs. Clowns". Retrieved 2013-03-09.
...his use of the terms "serious people" and "serious right thinking people", and his description of Monti as "the very eminent Eurocrat economist extremely serious person", should be understood as they would be when used, in the USA, to mock "very serious people" who treat only the conservative Washington, D.C. consensus as important.
Polls
[edit]Advocates of single-payer point to wide support[1][2] especially in polls,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] although the polling is mixed depending on how the question is asked.[11]
A 2001 article in the public health journal Health Affairs studied fifty years of American public opinion of various health care plans and concluded that, while there appears to be general support of a "national health care plan," poll respondents "remain satisfied with their current medical arrangements, do not trust the federal government to do what is right, and do not favor a single-payer type of national health plan."[12] Politifact rated a statement by Michael Moore "false" when he stated that "[t]he majority actually want single-payer health care." in 2009.[11] According to Politifact, responses on these polls largely depend on the wording. For example, people respond more favorably when they are asked if they want a system "like Medicare."[11]
Physicians for a National Health Program[13] the American Medical Student Association[14] and the California Nurses Association[15] are among advocacy groups that have called for the introduction of a single payer health care program in the United States. A study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that 59% of physicians "supported legislation to establish national health insurance" while 9% were neutral on the topic, and 32% opposed it.[16]
Polling source | Date(s) administered |
Question asked/ summary |
For | Against |
---|---|---|---|---|
Harvard University/Haris[6] | 1988 | Choice between Canadian system in which "the government pays most of the cost of health care for everyone out of taxes and the government sets all fees charged by hospitals and doctors…" and US system. | 61% | N/A |
Los Angeles Times[6] | 1990 | In the Canadian system of national health insurance, the government pays most of the cost of health care out of taxes and the government sets all fees charged by doctors and hospitals. Under the Canadian system – which costs the taxpayers less than the American system – people can choose their own doctors and hospitals. On balance, would you prefer the Canadian system or the system we have here in the United States? | 66% | N/A |
Wall Street Journal/NBC[6] | 1991 | Do you favor or oppose the US having a universal government-paid health care system like they have in Canada? | 69% | 20% |
Washington Post/ABC News[17] | October 2003 | Which would you prefer – (the current health insurance system in the United States, in which most people get their health insurance from private employers, but some people have no insurance); or (a universal health insurance program, in which everyone is covered under a program like Medicare that's run by the government and financed by taxpayers?) | 62% | 33% |
Civil Society Institute[6] | 2004 | Other major nations, such as Canada and England, guarantee their citizens health insurance on the job, through government programs, or via a nonprofit source. Would it be a good or bad idea for the United States to adopt the same approach to providing health care to everyone? | 67% | 27% |
New York Times/CBS News[18] | February 2007 | Do you think the federal government should guarantee health insurance for all Americans, or isn't this the responsibility of the federal government? | 64% | 27% |
CNN[19] | May 2007 | Do you think the government should provide a national health insurance program for all Americans, even if this would require higher taxes? | 64% | 35% |
Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg News[11][20] | October 2007 | Whether people supported a "government-run, government-financed health insurance program that would cover all Americans. This program would be administered like the current Medicare for citizens 65 and over." | 54% | 36% |
Associated Press/Yahoo[21] | December 2007 | Do you consider yourself a supporter of a single-payer health care system, that is a national health plan financed by taxpayers in which all Americans would get their insurance from a single government plan, or not? | 54% | 44% |
New York Times/CBS News[22] | February 2009 | 59% say the government should provide national health insurance, including 49% who say such insurance should cover all medical problems. | 59% | 32% |
Quinnipiac University (in FL, OH and PA)[23] | April 2008 | Do you think it's the government's responsibility to make sure that everyone in the United States has adequate health-care, or don't you think so? | 64%–FL 62%–OH 65%–PA | 32%–FL 34%–OH 31%–PA |
Time Magazine[24] | July 2009 | Would you favor or oppose a program that creates a national single-payer plan similar to Medicare for all, in which the government would provide healthcare insurance to all Americans? | 49% | 46% |
Kaiser Family Foundation[25] | July 2009 | Do you favor or oppose, "Having a national health plan in which all Americans would get their insurance through an expanded, universal form of Medicare-for all?" | 58% | 38% |
Rasmussen Reports[26] | October 2011 | Do you favor or oppose a single-payer health care system where the federal government provides coverage for everyone? | 35% | 49% |
Rasmussen Reports[27] | December 2012 | Do you favor or oppose a single-payer health care system where the federal government provides coverage for everyone? | 40% | 44% |
Stuff
[edit]Poverty
[edit]Some commentators such as Jim Taylor of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer[28] and the Institute of Education Sciences[29] have pointed to a correlation between US child poverty (based on reduced school lunches) and performance on the TIMSS test.
Country | Percent of reduced school lunches (US)[30]
Percent of relative child poverty (Other OECD countries)[31] |
PISA score[32] |
---|---|---|
United States | < 10% | 551 |
Finland | 3.4% | 536 |
Netherlands | 9.0% | 508 |
Belgium | 6.7% | 506 |
Switzerland | 6.8% | 501 |
United States | 10%–24.9% | 527 |
Canada | 13.6% | 524 |
New Zealand | 16.3% | 521 |
Japan | 14.3% | 520 |
Australia | 11.6% | 515 |
United States | 25–49.9% | 502 |
Estonia | 40.1% | 501 |
United States | 50–74.9% | 471 |
United States | > 75% | 446 |
Tax returns
[edit]Mitt Romney's tax returns became an issue during his 2012 Presidential campaign. Due to pressure from political rivals during the Republican primary campaign, Mitt Romney released most[33] of his 2010 tax return in late January 2012, along with a partial 2011 return which he promised to release in whole upon its completion.[34][35] His campaign promised to release his 2011 tax return as soon as it is filed, before October 15, 2012.[36] On August 16, 2012 Romney said that he has paid at least 13 percent annually on his federal income tax returns for the last ten years.[37] The average American family with income between $50,000 and $75,000 a year pays 12.8 percent annually. Romney's income was about $21 million in 2010, but much of his income is "carried interest," a type of management fee, that is not taxed as wages but rather at the lower capital gains tax rate.[38][39] In 2010 he reported a carried forward $4.8 million in capital losses from previous years, suggesting that he did not pay any capital gains taxes in 2009.[39]
Romney's fortune is in a blind trust, run by his long-time personal and business lawyer R. Bradford Malt, and has included investments which do not match his political philosophy.[40][41] Romney has previously stated that blind trusts are "an old ruse."[42]
Democratic Governor Martin O'Malley of Maryland accuses Romney of tax avoidance, as distinguished from illegal tax evasion.[36]
Background
[edit]In 1968, Mitt's father George W. Romney, set a precedent for presidential candidates to release their income tax returns. George Romney released 12 years of his returns, most other presidential candidates have release slightly fewer years.[43][44][45] These releases are not required by law. Statements made by some Democrats that “(Mitt) Romney is the first major party candidate for president of the United States in modern times not to release at least 12 years of tax returns,” have been rated false by Politifact.[46] According to FactCheck.org, John McCain is the only other recent major party nominee who has released just two years of returns, and we'd "have to go back more than 30 years" to find another "major party nominee who released less than five years of tax returns".[47]
PolitiFact states that several major presidential candidates have released fewer than 12 tax returns:
- In 2008, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton released seven, and John McCain released only two.
- In 2000, George W. Bush released nine and Al Gore released eight.
- In 1988, Michael Dukakis released six.
- In 1980, Ronald Reagan released only one.
Starting in 1977, all sitting presidents and vice-presidents have released their current tax returns, and challengers to incumbents have generally matched the incumbent in the number of returns publicly released.[46]
During Mitt Romney's previous campaigns for public office, an unsuccessful bid to become a senator from Massachusetts, a successful run for the governorship in 2002, and a presidential campaign in 2008, he has released required financial disclosures about his assets, but not income tax returns.[43]
At the beginning of his 2012 presidential campaign Romney stated, “I don’t intend to release the tax returns. I don’t.” But he released his 2010 return and 2011 estimated return on January 24, 2012 following challenges by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry.[45]
During the Republican primary debate in South Carolina Newt Gingrich stated, prior to Romney's release of any tax returns at all: “Look, he’s got to decide and the people of South Carolina have to decide. But if there’s anything in there that is going to help us lose the election, we should know it before the nomination. And if there’s nothing in there — if there’s nothing in there, why not release it?”[48] During the same debate Romney pledged "I'll release multiple years. I don't know how many years. And -- but I'll be happy to do that."[49] Gingrich believes that 2 years of tax returns are enough.[49] The earliest return that Gingrich himself released was his 2010 return.[50]
During the presidential campaign, Romney declined to disclose additional returns citing the matter as a distraction from more important issues, despite calls to do so by Democrats and several notable Republicans.[51] He states “I’m simply not enthusiastic about giving them hundreds or thousands of more pages to pick through, distort and lie about.”[48]
Romney stated on ABC television that he has been audited by the IRS, though he did not specify when the audit took place. His campaign did specify that "the audit did not result in a fine or penalty. Mitt Romney has fully complied with U.S. law and he has paid 100 percent of what he has owed," and that the audit did not take place in the last ten years.[52]
Media speculation
[edit]Though nothing can be known for sure without the release of Romney's tax returns, several large news organizations have speculated on the reasons for Romney's reluctance to release them. Business Week speculated on the possibility that Romney paid no income taxes in 2009.[53] Tax lawyers Edward D. Kleinbard and Peter C. Canellos, commenting on CNN, focused on Romney's Swiss bank account, his $100 million IRA, which could have been funded by a maximum of $30,000 annually, and what they consider to be an unjustified tax-loophole for hedge fund managers.[54] Tax law professor Michael Graetz commenting in the New York Times concentrated on the IRA, gift taxes to family trusts, and the use of tax havens such as the Cayman Islands and Bermuda.[55] The New Yorker listed four possibilities: 1. Extremely high levels of income; 2. More offshore accounts; 3. Politically explosive investments; and 4. A very, very low tax rate.[56]
The Obama campaign has suggested that in some years Romney may not have paid any taxes, but on August 16, 2012 Romney said that he has paid at least 13 percent annually on his federal income tax returns for the last ten years. The average American family with income between $50,000 and $75,000 a year pays 12.8 percent annually. Romney's income was about $21 million in 2010.[38]
In 1982 Romney invested in a tax shelter called the Gem Plan, which involved purchasing 5 new homes in Houston suburbs. The housing market, however, soon collapsed and it proved difficult to sell the houses. In 2010 Romney continued to receive interest income from a mortgage he offered to the residents of one of the houses who was unable to quality for a loan.[57]
Reactions
[edit]Republicans who have urged Romney to release his tax returns include former Mississippi governor Haley Barbour, Michael Steele, and Bill Kristol. George Will said "The cost of not releasing the returns are clear. Therefore, he must have calculated that there are higher costs in releasing them." Republican strategist Matthew Dowd said, "There's obviously something there, because if there was nothing there, he would say, ‘Have at it.' So there's obviously something there that compromises what he said in the past about something."[58][59] Donald Trump suggested that Romney release additional returns after Obama releases his college transcripts. [60]
The Romney campaign has stated that Democrats will keep on asking for more of Romney's returns no matter how many he releases. When Jim Messina, Obama campaign manager stated that they would only seek five years returns, Romney rejected the offer.[38]
In an TV interview, Romney told ABC's David Muir that he didn't know offhand if he'd ever paid a rate lower than the 13.9% he paid in 2010, suggested that he would look into it, and reiterated that he paid all the taxes required by law.[52]
In an interview in the Huffington Post, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Democrat, Nevada, said that he had received information from an unidentified investor in Bain Capital that Romney didn't pay any taxes for 10 years.[61] The accusation was repeated on the Senate floor by Reid on August 2, 2012.[62] On the following Sunday's political morning talk shows, the allegation was characterized by Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican, South Carolina, as unfounded and made up. Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee characterized Reid as a "dirty liar."[63] According to CBS News, Romney stated, "Let me also say, categorically, I have paid taxes every year -- and a lot of taxes. So Harry is simply wrong." PolitiFact.com's Truth-O-Meter rated the accusation as "Pants on Fire!"[64] CBS also reported that Romney had submitted 23 years of tax returns to the John McCain campaign in 2008, when he was being vetted for the vice presidential nomination. Although McCain did not review all the tax returns himself, he stated "Nothing in these tax returns showed that he did not pay taxes."[65]
Paul Ryan, Romney's presumptive vice presidential running mate, released two years of tax returns, after having several years examined by the Romney campaign. He paid 15.9% of his income in federal taxes in 2010 and 20% in 2011, more than Romney.[66]
Public opinion
[edit]Polls have shown most Americans favor Mitt Romney releasing his tax returns. According to a USA Today/Gallup poll, 54 percent of Americans favored Romney releasing more than two years of tax returns. In the same poll 47 percent of Americans said that what might be in the returns was "largely irrelevant to voters."[43]
In a Public Policy Polling poll, it was found that 61 percent of Americans said Romney should release more returns. As well, 56 percent of voters wanted Romney to release information regarding bank accounts in Switzerland and Bermuda.[67]
References
[edit]- ^ "Wonkbook: Voters like their single-payer health care", Washington Post.
- ^ "Health Reform for Beginners: The Difference Between Socialized Medicine, Single-Payer Health Care, and What We'll Be Getting", Washington Post
- ^ "One Nation, Uninsured," New York Times
- ^ "If the Health Care Mandate Is Struck Down, Single-Payer Becomes the Best Choice", Huffington Post
- ^ Single-Payer Poll, Survey, and Initiative Results, Western PA Coaltition for Single-payer healthcare
- ^ a b c d e "Two-thirds of Americans support Medicare-for-all," PNHP.
- ^ Single-Payer Health Care: If Not Now, When?, NPR.
- ^ Single Payer: The Health Care Plan Not On The Table, NPR.
- ^ Chart of Americans’ Support, Medicare for All.
- ^ "Another Poll Shows Majority Support for Single-Payer," Healthcare-NOW!
- ^ a b c d "Michael Moore claims a majority favor a single-payer health care system". PolitiFact. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ Health Affairs, Volume 20, No. 2. "Americans' Views on Health Policy: A Fifty-Year Historical Perspective." March/April 2001. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/20/2/33.full.pdf+html
- ^ "Proposal of the Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance". Physicians for a National Health Program.
- ^ Chua, Kao-Ping (2006), Single Payer 101 (PDF), Reston, Virginia: American Medical Student Association, retrieved 11 April 2012
- ^ Single-payer, or Medicare for all, is the way to go[dead link] from the California Nurses Association / National Nurses Organizing Committee.
- ^ Carroll AE, Ackerman RT (2008). "Support for National Health Insurance among U.S. Physicians: 5 years later". Ann. Intern. Med. 148 (7): 566–7. PMID 18378959.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "Question 49" (PDF). Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ "Public opinion on health care reform". Pnhp.org. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ "New polls on universal, tax-supported health care Physicians for a National Health Program". Pnhp.org. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ 2007 Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll.
- ^ "THE ASSOCIATED PRESS-YAHOO POLL" (PDF). Yahoo.com. Retrieved January 4, 2013.
- ^ "AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION: TODAY VS. 30 YEARS AGO" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved January 4, 2013.
- ^ Quinnipiac University – Office of Public Affairs (April 2, 2008). "Question 9: "Do you think it's the government's responsibility to make sure that everyone in the United States has adequate health-care, or don't you think so?"". Quinnipiac.edu. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ Time Magazine Poll
- ^ "Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: July 2009 – Topline" (PDF). Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ "Rasmussen Reports". Rasmussen Reports. January 1, 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
- ^ "Rasmussen Reports". Rasmussen Reports. Retrieved December 30, 2012.
- ^ Are Public Education Chicken Littles Wrong?, Jim Taylor
- ^ Closer Look 2009
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
NSSP
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Child poverty statistics: how the UK compares to other countries", The Guardian. The same UNICEF figures were used by Riddile.
- ^ Highlights From PISA 2009, Table 3.
- ^ Carter, Zack (2012-07-19). "Mitt Romney Taxes For 2010 Not Fully Disclosed". Huffington Post.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Holland, Steve; Dixon, Kim (January 25, 2012). "Romney returns show low tax rate; questions linger". Reuters. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
- ^ "Romney booed over tax returns". The Fox Nation. Janary 19, 2012. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b Adviser says Romney to release 2011 tax return by October 15, Reuters, August 19, 2012, accessed August 19, 2012.
- ^ Bailey, Holly (August 16, 2012).Romney: ‘I never paid less than 13 percent’ in taxes.Yahoo news
- ^ a b c Associated Press (August 17, 2012). "Mitt Romney nixes Obama bid for 5-year tax disclosure". Newsday. Retrieved August 17, 2012.
- ^ a b Romney’s 13.9% Tax Rate Shows Power Of Investment Tax Preference, Richard Rubin and Jesse Drucker, Bloomberg, January 25, 2012, accessed August 20, 2012.
- ^ Robert Frick, “Political Portfolios”, Kiplinger’s (January 2008).
- ^ Boston lawyer keeps steady hand on Romney’s holdings, Todd Wallack, Boston Globe, January 30, 2012, accessed August 19, 2012.
- ^ See video at The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Democalypse 2012 - Bain Damage - Romney's Blind Trust, July 16, 2012, accessed August 19, 2012.
- ^ a b c Poll: Most Americans think Romney should release more tax returns, Los Angeles Times.
- ^ "Romney Reveals 12–Year Income". The Pittsburgh Press. United Press International. November 26, 1967. p. 1, 9.
- ^ a b Shaxson, Nicholas (August 2012). "Where the Money Lives". Vanity Fair.
- ^ a b Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ claim about release of tax returns of major candidates is false, says PolitiFact Florida, Amy Sherman, Miami Herald, August 19, 2012.
- ^ "Romney and the Tax Return Precedent", FactCheck.org July 19, 2012.
- ^ a b Republicans will pay the costs of Romney’s tax returns, Colby King, Washington Post, July 22, 2012, accessed August 18, 2012.
- ^ a b Stephanie Condon. Gingrich: Obama "like a lawyer with a bad case" on tax issue (July 17, 2012).
- ^ Dana Bash. Santorum took in $3.6M in four years; highest tax rate was 28.3%, CNN (February 15, 2012).
- ^ Michael D. Shear; Trip Gabriel (July 18, 2012). "Romney Steadfast in the Face of Growing Calls to Release More Tax Returns". The New York Times. Retrieved July 19, 2012.
In the political environment that exists today, the opposition research of the Obama campaign is looking for anything they can use to distract from the failure of the president to reignite our economy, And I'm simply not enthusiastic about giving them hundreds or thousands of more pages to pick through, distort and lie about.
- ^ a b Romney Campaign Mum on Previous Tax Rates, Audit, ABC News, Z. Byron Wolf, July 30, 2012, accessed August 17, 2012.
- ^ What's Romney Hiding in His Tax Returns?, Joshua Green, Bloomburg BusinessWeek, July 17, 2012, accessed August 17, 2012.
- ^ Why won't Romney release more tax returns?, Edward D. Kleinbard and Peter C. Canellos, CNN, July 18, 2012.
- ^ Mitt Romney’s Financial Mysteries, Michael J. Graetz, Op-Ed in the New York Times, July 30, 2012, accessed August 18, 2012.
- ^ Why Won't Romney Release More Tax Returns?, John Cassidy, The New Yorker, July 16, 2012, accessed August 18, 2012,
- ^ Mike McIntire (August 9, 2012). "In Real Estate Deal, Romney Made His Loss a Couple's Gain". The New York Times. Retrieved August 10, 2012.
- ^ Opinion: Read my lips, 'No more tax returns', Meghan Holbrook, KSL.com Utah, Auguest 17, 2012.
- ^ George Will, Matthew Dowd Blast Romney For Not Releasing Tax Returns, George Stephanopoulos, ABC News, July 15, 2012, accessed August 17, 2012.
- ^ http://www.cnbc.com/id/48545430
- ^ Sam Stein; Ryan Grim (July 31, 2012). "Harry Reid: Bain Investor Told Me That Mitt Romney 'Didn't Pay Any Taxes For 10 Years'" (blog). Huffington Post. Retrieved August 6, 2012.
- ^ "Harry Reid takes Romney tax-accusation campaign to Senate floor" (blog). Los Angeles Times. August 2, 2012. Retrieved August 6, 2012.
- ^ Emmarie Huetteman (August 5, 2012). "Republicans Step Up Attacks Against Reid" (blog). The New York Times. Retrieved August 6, 2012.
- ^ "Harry Reid says anonymous source told him Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years". Politifact.Com. The Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved August 7, 2012.
Reid has made an extreme claim with nothing solid to back it up. Pants on Fire!
- ^ McCain: Reid is wrong about Romney's tax returns, CBS News, August 14, 2012, accessed August 17, 2012.
- ^ Paul Ryan releases two years of tax returns, CBS News, August 17, 2012
- ^ Americans Want To See What's In Mitt Romney's Tax Returns, Business Insider.
External links and further reading
[edit]
Mitt Romney physics jokes
[edit]Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has had numerous physics jokes named after him in the wake of the 2012 Presidential election.[1] These include Josh Marshall's Schrödinger's Romney[2], The New York Times's Quantum Theory of Mitt Romney,[3], and Daily Kos's Mitt's Boson.[1] The jokes are satirically used as physics explanations for Romney's perceived flip-flopping or lying on numerous issues.[1][3]
Disease or condition | Effectiveness of psychoanalitic treatment in adults
( -Proven, -Presumed, -No effect) | |
---|---|---|
Schizophrenia (acute phase) with medical drugs | ||
Schizophrenia (stabilised, followed upon outpatient basis) with medical drugs |
2012 Zombie controversy
[edit]The 2012 Zombie controversy sometimes called the "Zombie apocalypse"[4][5] is an internet and media controversy surrounding a string of macabre incidents which resemble "Zombie"-like characteristics. Beginning with the Miami cannibalism incident, reports have grown to numerous incidents which have created controversy and speculation.[4][6]
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDS) was asked about the incident to which it responded that it "does not know of a virus or condition that would reanimate the dead (or one that would present zombie-like symptoms)."[5][7]
It has been suggested that the controversy is because of the popularity of Zombies in popular culture as well as the difficult conditions facing people in the 2008–2012 recession.[6]
Overview of "zombie" incidents
[edit]After the initial incident in Miami where Rudy Eugene ate 75%-80% of the face of Ronald Poppo, a homeless man, there has been a series of other gory incidents.
- 2012 Miami cannibalism incident, Rudy Eugene eats the face of Ronald Poppo.
- A manhunt is launched for Luka Rocco Magnotta, who is suspected of sending a severed body parts to different political parties in Canada.[4]
- Alexander Kinyua admitted to eating his roomate's heart and part of his brain in Maryland.[4]
- Wayne Carter cut his chest and threw pieces of his intestines at police.[4]
Media and internet reaction
[edit]In the wake of the incidents, The term "zombie" has been the second highest trending topic on Google trends.[6]
The Daily Beast created a Google Map of various "zombie" or related odd incidents.[6]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c The discovery of Mitt's Boson, Daily Kos
- ^ Schrodinger’s Romney, Talking Points Memo
- ^ a b The Romney Uncertainty Principle, New York Times
- ^ a b c d e "'Zombie apocalypse’ trending as bad news spreads quickly," CNN
- ^ a b Feds vs. Zombies: CDC officially denies 'Zombie Apocalypse', RT
- ^ a b c d "After gory incidents, online 'zombie' talk grows," The Associated Press
- ^ "No, the zombie apocalypse isn't coming, assures the CDC," MSNBC.com