Jump to content

User:Brustopher/GGAcademia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
After looking thoroughly into this I have come to the conclusion that there is close to no academic work on GG yet. Instead I will be using this page as a general place to note stuff related to the article
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I am using this page to very slowly look through the academic sources, summarise them and eventually turn them into a draft. At this point, this is mostly for my own reference so apologies if it looks like gibberish.

Heron Belford Goker

[edit]
  • People with genuine ethics concerns exist within gamergate but they're tarred by their association with a harassment campaign.
  • Instead of dissociating they deny the harassment exists and claim its all made up. These sorts of denial "create an atmosphere where bad faith must be assumed
  • Its harassment based origins "inoculate journalist outlets against valid criticism"
  • this stuff about IRC folk being bastards.[1]
  • thread bombing by IRC folks to overwhelm moderators and appear like a mass outrage.
  • "Not all gamergaters" must be remembered that there are some moderates and they're not all scum.

Gasser et al[2]

[edit]
  • "The post provokes a vitriolic campaign against Quinn that quickly morphs into a broader crusade against alleged corruption in games journalism. The movement, labeled #GamerGate, involves considerable abuse and harassment—including rape and death threats—of female developers and game critics." (not much in here)

"Objectivity" in game reviews

[edit]