User:Briannemacpherson/sandbox

After reviewing the article on Dody Woods, I am able to answer the following three questions:

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Although there are few references in this short article, the references are reliable and appropriate to what kind of information was given on Dody. Ex., all his hockey states were referenced from hockey databases.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It is apparent that the author was unable to find any information about Dody's life besides his hockey career. I feel that his hockey career was over-represented and his life external to hockey was extremely underrepresented.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are no found biases within the article. The information was presented in a factual tone. The author held no position on the article and did not present the research in a biased way.