User:BishopTakesQueen
This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Univ/Writing_in_Women's_and_Gender_Studies_(F). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |
Bagilhole, Barbara. "Survivors in a male preserve: A study of British women academics' experiences and perceptions of discrimination in a UK university". Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 4, 1993, pp. 431-447.
This article discusses the research done in British universities regarding the underrepresentation of women in academia. This presents scholarly research where other articles only discuss the personal experiences of the author. I have used this to add information to my article about honorary men in modern academia.
King, Anthony. "The female combat soldier.". European Journal of International Relations, vol. 22, no. 1, 2016, pp. 122-143.
This article discussed women who made military careers for themselves and how their gender affected their time in service. It details another field in which people may view women as honorary men. I have used this article as a source to add information on this subject and to expand the introduction to my article.
Heisch, Allison. “Queen Elizabeth I and the Persistence of Patriarchy”. Feminist Review, no. 4, 1980, pp. 45-56.
This article discusses the issues with our current method of studying women in history. It asserts that we only pay attention to those who are fulfilling the roles of the men around them. This article has already been used by other users in editing my article, so it may provide more helpful insight into the topic.
Duncanson, Claire, & Woodward, Rachel. “Regendering the military: Theorizing
women’s military participation”. Security Dialogue, vol.47, no. 1, 2016, pp. 3-21.
This article approaches the inclusion of women in the military from the perspective of existing feminist critiques. I have not yet used this article in my research. It will, however, provide an additional point of view on a topic I am already discussing: women in the military.
Essers, Caroline, & Benschop, Yvonne. “Enterprising Identities: Female Entrepreneurs of Moroccan or Turkish Origin in the Netherlands”. Sage Journals, vol. 28, no. 1, 2007, pp. 49-69.
This article explored the impact of race and gender on Morroccan and Turkish women entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. I used it for my summary, but not yet for my research. I hope this article will provide insight into an additional field where women are not typically found.
Burman, Erica. “Engendering authority in the group.”. Psychodynamic Counselling, vol. 7, no. 3, 2001, pp. 347-369.
This article explores the different ways women interact and view each other in the workplace, one of which is as an honorary man. Though I have not yet cited this article, I have found the ideas in it reflected in other articles. I hope to use it to draw comparisons between women in the workplace and women in academia.
Cvejić, Žarko. “FEMININE CHARMS AND HONORARY MASCULINIZATION/DE-FEMINIZATION: GENDER AND THE CRITICAL RECEPTION OF THE VIRTUOSE, 1815-1848.”. New Sound: International Magazine for Music, no. 46, 2015, pp. 23-38.
This article provides another historical perspective for the idea of the honorary man in the context of piano virtuosos in the 19th century. It discusses the difference in reception of male and female virtuosos and how those responses were heavily gendered. This will provide historical context and show that this phenomenon has occurred throughout history.
Weiner, Jennie Miles, & Burton, Laura J. “The Double Bind for Women: Exploring the Gendered Nature of Turnaround Leadership in a Principal Preparation Program.”. Harvard Educational Review, vol. 86, no. 3, 2016, pp. 339-365.
This article discusses how women and men both view leaders in the same context but have differing views of themselves as leaders. This article is not directly about honorary males, but can be used to discuss the “double bind” one might feel.