User:Bemrich/Students for sensible drug policy
The parts I'm going to be editing will be
Don't worry I linked them all in the wiki. I just couldn't get the cites to stay from page to page.
Access to harm reduction
[edit]Harm reduction is the act of mitigating negative consequences associated with drug use. SSDP provides tools for its members to advocate for the implementation of harm reduction measures and support to engage in direct service work. Harm reduction strategies aim to reduce the negative consequences of drug use, such as overdose, HIV transmission, and hepatitis C infection. These strategies include providing access to clean syringes, safe injection sites, and overdose prevention medications like naloxone. Harm reduction has been shown to be an effective way of reducing the harms associated with drug use and improving public health outcomes.
A sensible drug policy also recognizes the importance of evidence-based approaches to drug treatment. Effective addiction treatment should be readily available and tailored to individual needs.[1] This includes medication-assisted treatment, counseling, and support groups. By providing access to effective addiction treatment, individuals can overcome their addiction and lead healthier, more productive lives.
I have made an edit for that section. I will also add more into a section. I will be adding a section of racial disparities in drug poilicies.
Racial Disparities
The War on Drugs has been criticized for its harsh penalties for drug offenses, which have led to the over-representation of people of color in the criminal justice system. The sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine, for example, have been shown to have a significant racial bias. Crack cocaine was more commonly used in black communities, and penalties for crack possession and distribution were much harsher than those for powder cocaine, which was more commonly used by white individuals.
Drug policy reform is necessary to address the racial disparities in drug policy. One solution is to shift the focus of drug policy from criminalization to treatment and rehabilitation. Drug addiction is a public health issue, and individuals struggling with addiction should be given access to appropriate treatment and resources.Reforms that prioritize treatment and rehabilitation over criminalization, coupled with accountability for law enforcement officials, are necessary to ensure a fair and equitable drug policy.
The last section I am going to add onto will be the Global Drug Policy
Global drug policy
[edit]SSDP is a member of the Economic and Social Council and thus a consultant to its functional commissions. As such, SSDP has been advocating for policy reform and youth inclusion at the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, including the 2016 Special Session of the UN General Assembly on the World Drug Problem and the High Level Ministerial Segment in 2019.
SSDP Global Drug Policy and Development Consultant, Orsi Fehér, held the office of Treasurer on the board of the Vienna NGO Committee on Drugs between 2018–2020.
SSDP's former International Program Coordinator, Jake Agliata, is a co-founder of the Paradigma Youth Coalition.
The organization also coordinates youth participation in global campaigns such as Support. Don't Punish and International Overdose Awareness Day.
Protugal's drug policy, implemented in 2001, is based on the principle of harm reduction. Drug use and possession for personal use are no longer criminal offenses but administrative ones. Instead of facing criminal charges, individuals caught with drugs are referred to a Commission for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction, where they receive a health assessment and may be recommended for treatment. Portugal’s drug policy has been successful in reducing drug use and associated harms, including HIV infections and overdose deaths.
This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Article Draft
[edit]Lead
[edit]SMSU Students for Sensible Drug Reform
Drug policy has been a hotly debated topic for decades, with differing views on how best to approach drug use and addiction. However, as our understanding of addiction and its root causes has improved, there is growing recognition of the need for a sensible drug policy that prioritizes harm reduction and public health.
Article body
[edit]A sensible drug policy recognizes that drug addiction is a complex issue with many underlying causes, including poverty, trauma, and mental illness. Instead of punishing individuals for their drug use, a sensible drug policy prioritizes providing access to effective addiction treatment, mental health support, and social services to address the root causes of addiction.[2] Stigmatization may also discourage illicit drug users from getting health care due to fear of poor treatment by health care providers or fear of trouble with the authorities. Societal norms in the United States cast drug use as an unacceptable behavior, so many hold negative opinions about people who use drugs.[3]
One key aspect of a sensible drug policy is decriminalization. Rather than criminalizing drug use, which can lead to the stigma and discrimination of people who use drugs, decriminalization focuses on treating drug addiction as a public health issue.[4] This approach is supported by evidence showing that decriminalization leads to reduced rates of drug use, improved public health outcomes, and reduced rates of overdose deaths.
Another important element of a sensible drug policy is harm reduction. Harm reduction strategies aim to reduce the negative consequences of drug use, such as overdose, HIV transmission, and hepatitis C infection. These strategies include providing access to clean syringes, safe injection sites, and overdose prevention medications like naloxone. Harm reduction has been shown to be an effective way of reducing the harms associated with drug use and improving public health outcomes.
A sensible drug policy also recognizes the importance of evidence-based approaches to drug treatment. Effective addiction treatment should be readily available and tailored to individual needs. [5]This includes medication-assisted treatment, counseling, and support groups. By providing access to effective addiction treatment, individuals can overcome their addiction and lead healthier, more productive lives.
A sensible drug policy is critical to addressing the root causes of drug addiction and reducing the harms associated with drug use. By prioritizing harm reduction, decriminalization, and evidence-based addiction treatment, we can create a society that supports individuals struggling with addiction and promotes public health and well-being. It is time for policymakers to embrace a sensible drug policy that reflects our evolving understanding of addiction and its impact on our communities.
References
[edit]- ^ Strang, John; Babor, Thomas; Caulkins, Jonathan; Fischer, Benedikt; Foxcroft, David; Humphreys, Keith (2012-01-07). "Drug policy and the public good: evidence for effective interventions". The Lancet. 379 (9810): 71–83. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61674-7. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 22225672.
- ^ Ahern, Jennifer; Stuber, Jennifer; Galea, Sandro (2007-05). "Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users". Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 88 (2–3): 188–196. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.014.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Bobo, Lawrence D.; Thompson, Victor (2006-06). "Unfair by Design: The War on Drugs, Race, and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Justice System". Social Research: An International Quarterly. 73 (2): 445–472. doi:10.1353/sor.2006.0010. ISSN 1944-768X.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Mitchell, Ojmarrh; Caudy, Michael S. (2015-03-04). "Examining Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests". Justice Quarterly. 32 (2): 288–313. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.761721. ISSN 0741-8825.
- ^ Strang, John; Babor, Thomas; Caulkins, Jonathan; Fischer, Benedikt; Foxcroft, David; Humphreys, Keith (2012-01). "Drug policy and the public good: evidence for effective interventions". The Lancet. 379 (9810): 71–83. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61674-7.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)