User:Beepboop327/Scuole Grandi of Venice/BUsunz Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
- BeepBoop327
- Link to draft you're reviewing:
- User:Beepboop327/Scuole Grandi of Venice
Lead
[edit]The lead is from the original article.
Content
[edit]The content is relevant to the topic and up to date. There are lots of new information being added. The general points are being highlighted using bullet points and you might consider on expanding your points with more sources to back it up.
Tone and Balance
[edit]The overall tone is in a unbiased manner. It is very informational and helpful to gain a better understanding of the topic.
Sources and References
[edit]There are a bunch of references to sources mentioned in the article. All of the sources in the bibliography are reliable sources and relevant to the topic. However, mostly all of the article rely on the first source as almost all footnotes are linked to the first source.
Organization
[edit]The content is well organised with few grammatical or spelling errors. It have been divided into 5 general topics. Although some paragraphs are only bullet points instead of writing in complete sentences, the content is organized in a manner that is easy to follow and understand.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]No images were attached, you could add some appropriate images to create a better representation of the topic.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]the article overall is more completed with new information added. The strength of the article is that it gives a lot of new perspectives on the given topic compared to the original article. There should be a variety of sources to reference instead of heavily relying on a single source.