User:Bbbzhu/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]- Welsh Corgi: Welsh Corgi
- I own a Welsh Corgi and would like to know more about this type of dogs.
Lead
[edit]The lead is concise with the right amount of information needed for readers to quickly grasp the major details about the article. The lead paragraph/sentence has included a simple and brief introduction about the subject. The lead introduction includes a table of contents that specifies the sections included in this article. The lead introduction does not include information not present in the article. The lead is concise with the right amount of information needed for readers to quickly grasp the major details about the article.
Content
[edit]All of the article's content is relevant to the topic. Most of the content is up to date, but some sections might need update, for example, the current information for Welsh Corgi in the United States section. There is no missing content or content that does not belong to the article. The article does not deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps, and does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Yes, the article is written and edited in a neutral tone. There is no bias toward any sections of the article. There is no obvious viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. But there is missing citations here and there. The article does not persuade the reader to favor one position or another.
Sources and References
[edit]Most of the facts found in the article with a footnote does not come from a reliable journal or article. The reference list does come from reliable journal or book. The sources are thorough. The notes section is current but needed more current reference list, most of the references are 20 years old. There are links in the foot note section that does not work anymore.
Organization
[edit]The article is well written. There is no obvious grammar or spelling errors. The article is broken down into logical sections that is easy for reader to find the information they need.
Images and Media
[edit]The article include image that enhances the understanding of the topic. Images are well-captioned. All images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. Images are laid out in a visually appealing way.
Checking the talk page
[edit]The related talk page includes information editors have doubts and think should add into the article to make it more informative. This article is related to WikiProject Dogs / Breeds and WikiProject Wales. There is no difference from the way we've talked about it in class.
Overall impressions
[edit]The article needs update on checking the references. More images could be added to the color section of each of the Welsh Corgi. The article discussed the breed's history and the cultural impact. It is very thorough information. The article can be improved by adding in more image and more detailed description of the two breeds. The article is well developed, just needs some editing to details.
Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: Talk:Welsh Corgi