Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
Han, M., Park, Y., & Kim, H. (2017). Comparison of Abbott RealTime genotype II, GeneMatrix restriction fragment mass polymorphism and Sysmex HISCL HCV Gr assays for hepatitis C virus genotyping. Clinical Chemistry And Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 55(8), 1122-1128. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0130
Hong, S., Ji, S., Rhee, H., Shin, S., Hwang, S., & Lee, S. et al. (2008). A simple and accurate SNP scoring strategy based on typeIIS restriction endonuclease cleavage and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. BMC Genomics, 9(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-276
Lee, J., Hachiya, A., Shin, S., Lee, J., Gatanaga, H., & Oka, S. et al. (2013). Restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) analysis based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for detecting antiretroviral resistance in HIV-1 infected patients. Clinical Microbiology And Infection, 19(6), E263-E270. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12167
Lee, H., Kim, S., Hwang, T., Bae, J., Kim, S., & Kim, J. et al. (2011). Analytical and clinical performances of a restriction fragment mass polymorphism assay for detection and genotyping of a wide spectrum of human papillomaviruses. Journal Of Medical Virology, 83(3), 471-482. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21992
Lee, Hyo-Pyo; Cho, Woojae; Bae, Jae-Man; Shin, Ji Young; Shin, Soo-Kyung; Hwang, Sun Young; Min, Kyung Tae; Kim, Soo Nyung; Lee, Sun Joo; Kim, Soo-Ok; Yoo, Wang Don; Hong, Sun Pyo (2013). Comparison of the clinical performance of restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) and Roche linear array HPV test assays for HPV detection and genotyping. Journal of Clinical Virology, 57(2), 130–135. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2013.01.014
Sohn, Yong-Hak; Ko, Sun-Young; Kim, Myeong Hee; Oh, Heung-Bum (2010). Performance evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II for hepatitis C virus genotyping. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 48(4), –. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2010.093
