User:BaileyHutchi/Friedrich Wöhler/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

"Friedrich Wöhler" American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Boston.Proceedings (1846-1906) XVIII (1883): 463. ProQuest. Web. 22 Sep. 2022, https://www.proquest.com/docview/89623242?parentSessionId=oURFNzxLHNxWLvoqLX%2F4hWBXgqqxMXlwj5bJYWluYmg%3D&pq-origsite=summon&accountid=8240
- This is an article announcing the death of Wöhler and detailing parts of his life^[1]
Esteban, Soledad. “Liebig–Wöhler Controversy and the Concept of Isomerism.” American Chemical Society Publications, Sept. 2008, https://pubs-acs-org.ezproxy3.lhl.uab.edu/doi/abs/10.1021/ed085p1201
- This is an article examining Wöhler's involvement in the concept of Isomerism
Hanks, Patrick, et al. “Wöhler, Friedrich.” Oxford Reference, Oxford University Press, 2016, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199677764.001.0001/acref-9780199677764
- This is short entry with minor information on Wöhler
Jensen, William B. “Melting Points and the Characterization of Organic Compounds.” American Chemical Society Publications, Jan. 2009, https://pubs.acs.org/?elqTrackId=ef01e2c60d8d4a7f8c797bde9889cd31&elqaid=4144&elqat=2
- This is an article examining Wöhler's involvement in the characterization of organic compounds
Kinne-Saffran, E., and R.K. Kinne. “Vitalism and Synthesis of Urea.” Karger Courses, 1999, https://www-karger-com.ezproxy3.lhl.uab.edu/Article/Pdf/13463
- This is an article examining Wöhler's involvement in vitalism and synthesis of Urea

References

Esteban, Soledad. “Liebig–Wöhler Controversy and the Concept of Isomerism.” American Chemical Society Publications, Sept. 2008, https://pubs-acs-org.ezproxy3.lhl.uab.edu/doi/abs/10.1021/ed085p1201.

"Friedrich Wöhler" American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Boston.Proceedings (1846-1906) XVIII (1883): 463. ProQuest. Web. 22 Sep. 2022, https://www.proquest.com/docview/89623242?parentSessionId=oURFNzxLHNxWLvoqLX%2F4hWBXgqqxMXlwj5bJYWluYmg%3D&pq-origsite=summon&accountid=8240

Hanks, Patrick, et al. “Wöhler, Friedrich.” Oxford Reference, Oxford University Press, 2016, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199677764.001.0001/acref-9780199677764

Jensen, William B. “Melting Points and the Characterization of Organic Compounds.” American Chemical Society Publications, Jan. 2009, https://pubs.acs.org/?elqTrackId=ef01e2c60d8d4a7f8c797bde9889cd31&elqaid=4144&elqat=2

Kinne-Saffran, E., and R.K. Kinne. “Vitalism and Synthesis of Urea.” Karger Courses, 1999, https://www-karger-com.ezproxy3.lhl.uab.edu/Article/Pdf/13463

^ "Preview unavailable - ProQuest". www.proquest.com. Retrieved 2022-09-22.

[1] "Preview unavailable - ProQuest". www.proquest.com. Retrieved 2022-09-22.

[1]