User talk:AnAccount2
Hi! AnAccount2 23:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
who is this
reply
[edit]Trouble is that Peer Review usually doesn't attract the right kind of copy-editors. There aren't enough of them. Tony 01:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Battery electric vehicle
[edit]Can you find a reference for the NiMH (hybrid) fuel use requirement? I had not heard of that. I marked as needing a reference. Thanks, Leonard G. 16:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
C++
[edit]Please read WP:EL. If you believe the link you added to C++ meets one or more of the "reasons to add" and does not meet any of the "reasons not to add", please state your case. Thank you. --Yamla 22:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- This is a friendly reminder. You (User:AnAccount2) are about to violate WP:3RR on article C++ and this could result in blocking. (Requestion 23:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC))
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to C++. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Xerxesnine 14:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Arbcom
[edit]Hello,
What do you think about going to the arbitration commitee with the C++ link issue? --Urod 08:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:New Vehicle Purchase Preference.gif
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:New Vehicle Purchase Preference.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article List of production battery electric vehicles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nowadays the list is impossible to keep up to date as there must be thousands of them. Even if you could keep it up to date it would be far too long.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of production battery electric vehicles for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of production battery electric vehicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.