User:Alex Stacey/Editing notes
Appearance
This is a work in progress and just intended as a personal aid to learning about editing.
Definitions
[edit]- Peacock terms - terms that merely promote the subject of the article without imparting verifiable information. Examples include describing people as "important", "main", or "among the greatest" in their field, without explaining why. When using these terms, make sure you have sources to support them, and that the reader understands why the person or subject is so regarded. See Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms
- Sock puppets - Editing using a dummy account for the purpose of bigging something up. See Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry
Requesting sources
[edit]What to type | What it makes | ||
---|---|---|---|
{{unreferenced}} |
|||
{{unreferenced section}} |
|||
{{citations missing}} |
| ||
{{cite check}} |
|||
{{more footnotes}} |
| ||
{{no footnotes}} |
| ||
{{one source}} |
| ||
{{pagenumbers}} |
| ||
{{primarysources}} |
| ||
{{refimprove}} |
| ||
{{refimprovesect}} |
| ||
{{self-published}} |
|
Inline
[edit]What to type | What it makes |
---|---|
{{citation needed}} |
[citation needed] |
{{clarify}} |
[clarification needed] |
{{copyvio link}} |
[infringing link?] |
{{dead link}} |
[dead link] |
{{dubious}} |
[dubious – discuss] |
{{failed verification}} |
[failed verification] |
{{or}} |
[original research?] |
{{page needed}} |
[page needed] |
{{reference necessary}} |
[citation needed] |
{{request quotation}} |
[need quotation to verify] |
{{timefact}} |
[chronology citation needed] |
{{update after}} |
[needs update] |
{{verify credibility}} |
[unreliable source?] |
{{verify source}} |
[verification needed] |
{{which?}} |
[which?] |
{{who}} |
[who?] |