User:Acho98/Bite of Seattle/Annikahille Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? Acho98
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Acho98/Bite of Seattle
Lead
[edit]Lead evaluation
[edit]The Lead has been updated with further information; it clearly explains what the festival is, where it is located, and then briefly describes the content of the article. I think the lead gives the right amount of information and is not overly detailed.
Content
[edit]Content evaluation
[edit]The content added enhances the overall article, and is up-to-date. The added Accomplishments section gives notability to the article.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The content is very neutral, speaking for itself. All of the information is fact-based and none of it is opinion-based. The content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another, and there is no shown bias.
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]The sources are relevant and current, they reflect the available literature on the topic. However, the references section lacks clickable links at this time.
Organization
[edit]Organization evaluation
[edit]The organization of the content is logical and works well for the article. I didn't notice grammatical or spelling errors. Each section reflects the major points of the topic.
Images and Media
[edit]Images and media evaluation
[edit]The image is from Flickr and the Wiki Commons, so it adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. The caption explains the image well. There could be more images added of the different attractions from years past, such as food trucks or food options.
Overall impressions
[edit]Overall evaluation
[edit]This article is really great! Well-stated and thorough information, that is based on facts and lets the reader interpret their point of view. I think the added information is critical to the success of the article. One last thing: at the bottom, Wiki still is classifying the article as a stub. Not sure if this just hasn't been updated yet or not!