User:155.247.134.169/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- I chose this article because it is a seasonal job occurring with food production and relates to the season we are currently in, Fall. The lead to this article does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. The lead includes a brief description of the articles major sections however the lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise and right to the point.
- Lead
The lead to this article does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. The lead includes a brief description of the articles major sections however the lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise and right to the point.
Content evaluation
[edit]The article's content is relevant to the topic and the content is up-to-date. Eevrything is relevent however there is nothing written for “types of fruit”.
Tone and Balance
[edit]The article is neutral. There is no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. The viewpoint of fruits that are commonly picked seemed underrepresented. The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.
Sources and References
[edit]All the facts in the article seem backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The sources do reflect the available literature on the topic? Some of the sources are older and some are current. The links do work.
Organization
[edit]The article is well-written and easy to read. I dont see any grammatical or spelling errors. The article seems well-organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.
Images and Media
[edit]
- The article does include images that enhance understanding of the topic. The images are well- captioned with explanations of exactly what they are. The images seem to adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations and are laid out in a visually appealing way.
Checking the talk page
[edit]The article says that it is not the most accurate to deplit a worldwide view. It seems to have been used for a WikiProject. The way Wikipedia discusses this topic for its history and upcoming rather than in class when we talk about the agricultural side and health benefits.
Overall impressions
[edit]Overall the article looks good. It’s strengths are its clartiy and structure and it could be improved with more information per topic. The article's completeness could be developed better with additional information, however it is accurate and easy to read.