User:10Adrian/The Rhetorical Presidency/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1018&context=communication_facpub
- This source rethinks the rhetorical presidency and the presidential rhetoric. It briefly goes through the history of the rhetorical presidency at the start of the article.
Scacco, J., & Coe, K. (2015). The Ubiquitous Presidency: Toward a New Paradigm for Studying Presidential Communication. International Journal of Communication, 10(24).^[1]
- It is a reading from in class that goes into detail, what the Rhetorical Presidency talks about. It explains key concepts from the paradigm that I think are essential to having in the Wikipedia project.
Teten, Ryan L. (2003). "Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 33 (2): 333–346. ISSN 0360-4918.^[2]
- The goal with this source is to add more information on more recent presidents as well, and this source will help expand the page info into the 60s-80's era of presidents. Specifically this source deals with the State of the Union address which will help.
Lim, Elvin T. (2002). "Five Trends in Presidential Rhetoric: An Analysis of Rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 32 (2): 328–366. ISSN 0360-4918. ^[3]
- With this source, it goes more into detail about the history of the paradigm and what the paradigm entails with presidential rhetoric. It is a key journal source that will add on to the history and concepts section on the Wikipedia Page.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41427429#metadata_info_tab_contents^[4]

This source tells us more about how the rhetorical presidency is standing up today.

https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34360/chapter/291468739^[5]
This is a source from oxford academy that helps you understand the rhetorical presidency better.

References

^ Scacco, Joshua M.; Coe, Kevin (2021-04-22). "The Ubiquitous Presidency". doi:10.1093/oso/9780197520635.001.0001. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ Teten, Ryan L. (2003). "Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 33 (2): 333–346. ISSN 0360-4918.
^ Lim, Elvin T. (2002-06). "Five Trends in Presidential Rhetoric: An Analysis of Rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 32 (2): 328–348. doi:10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00223.x. ISSN 0360-4918. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
^ LARACEY, MEL (2009). ""The Rhetorical Presidency" Today: How Does It Stand Up?". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 39 (4): 908–931. ISSN 0360-4918.
^ academic.oup.com https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34360/chapter/291468739. Retrieved 2023-02-07. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1] Scacco, Joshua M.; Coe, Kevin (2021-04-22). "The Ubiquitous Presidency". doi:10.1093/oso/9780197520635.001.0001. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[2] Teten, Ryan L. (2003). "Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 33 (2): 333–346. ISSN 0360-4918.

[3] Lim, Elvin T. (2002-06). "Five Trends in Presidential Rhetoric: An Analysis of Rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 32 (2): 328–348. doi:10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00223.x. ISSN 0360-4918. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[4] LARACEY, MEL (2009). ""The Rhetorical Presidency" Today: How Does It Stand Up?". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 39 (4): 908–931. ISSN 0360-4918.

[5] academic.oup.com https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34360/chapter/291468739. Retrieved 2023-02-07. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]