Jump to content

The True Story of the Novel

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The True Story of the Nove
Image of the 1996 book jacket
1996 Book cover
AuthorMargaret Anne Doody
SubjectFiction technique, history and criticism. Literary criticism. Interpretation.
Published1996
PublisherRutgers University Press
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint, E-book
Pages580
ISBN9780585234205 9780813524535
OCLC44964682
809.3
LC ClassPN3355.D66 1996
WebsiteOfficial website
Includes bibliographical references (p. 531-553) and index.

The True Story of the Novel is an extensive [1] nonfiction book that is a feminist critique[1] and revisionist history of the novel.[1] It was written by Margaret Anne Doody and published by Rutgers University Press in 1996.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Synopsis

[edit]

Doody's view about the ancient novel is that it has significantly impacted Western culture, as well as how this culture changes over time. She focuses on the high caliber of writing that these ancient novels seem to demonstrate.[1] Doody enlarges the traditional definition of the novel by noting the similarities between these works found across two thousand years of their existence.[2] This approach views the novel as both an archetype throughout time and a modern form of creation.[1]

One of the main thrusts of this book is to challenge the established divisions within literary history, such as those between novels and romances,[2] ancient and modern works, realistic and fantastical narratives, and historical accounts and fictional creations. It aims to break down these conventional divisions and create a new understanding of the novel's evolution.[2][1]

In the introductory chapter, the author notes Nietzsche's criticism of Alexandrian culture, which Nietzsche saw as a corrupt and decadent from divergent conditions and foreign influences. However, the author flips this negative view around, full-circle, using Nietzsche's descriptions not to condemn the variety of cultures but to tout it as a model for inclusivity.[1]

Hence, Doody aims to challenge "parochial" (narrow) theories such as in Ian Watt's Rise of the Novel that have focused on a chosen time period or language. She argues that such views discount significant influences and discount the evolution of the novel over time and in different cultures.[2][1]

Critique

[edit]

Ashley Brown, writing for the academic journal entitled The Comparatist, says that Dowdy incorrectly assumes that most students believe that the novel originated in 18th-century England.[2] Also, Brown says that Dowdy challenges Ian Watt's seminal work, "The Rise of the Novel". While Watt primarily focuses on English authors like Defoe, Fielding, Richardson and perhaps Sterne, he never asserts that the novel was invented during this period.[2] Also in defense of Watt, Brown says that Watt correctly emphasizes the significant rise in the novel's importance within British literature during this era, particularly through the influence of authors like Richardson on continental European literature.[2]

Peter New, writing for the academic journal entitled, The Modern Language Review, says that the examples of common tropes that Doody employs to advance her argument that the novel has a millennials long history does not succeed.[3] In this, New says that Doody inaccurately contends that the novel's history encompasses "a continuous history from ancient Greek and Latin prose fiction, through Medieval and Renaissance works in the Romance languages" and a geography that goes much further than has been acknowledged by Western scholars. Also, the book has too much encyclopedic detail to be convincing.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Turner, James Grantham (1999). "Reviewed work: The True Story of the Novel, Margaret Anne Doody". Modern Philology. 96 (3): 364–370. doi:10.1086/492765. JSTOR 439222.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Brown, Ashley (1998). "Reviewed work: The True Story of the Novel, by Margaret Anne Doody". The Comparatist. 22: 188–190. JSTOR 44366996.
  3. ^ a b c New, Peter (1998). "Reviewed work: The True Story of the Novel, Margaret Anne Doody". The Modern Language Review. 93 (3): 773–774. doi:10.2307/3736507. JSTOR 3736507.
  4. ^ Hagen, W. M. (1998). "Reviewed work: The True Story of the Novel, Margaret Anne Doody". World Literature Today. 72 (1): 218–219. doi:10.2307/40153740. JSTOR 40153740.
  5. ^ Davis, Lennard J. (1997). "Novel Worship". Novel: A Forum on Fiction. 30 (3): 405–408. doi:10.2307/1345762. JSTOR 1345762.
  6. ^ Richetti, John (1998). "Reviewed work: The True Story of the Novel, Margaret Anne Doody". The American Historical Review. 103 (1): 137–138. doi:10.2307/2650781. JSTOR 2650781.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Goldhill, Simon. “Finding the Time for Ancient Novels.” Daedalus, vol. 150, no. 1, 2021, pp. 26–39. JSTOR, . Accessed 26 Dec. 2024
  • Showalter, Elaine (1984). "Women's Time, Women's Space: Writing the History of Feminist Criticism". Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature. 3 (1/2): 29–43. doi:10.2307/463823. JSTOR 463823.
  • Delsandro, Erica Gene (2019). "No More Missed Connections". Woolf Studies Annual. 25: 73–96. JSTOR 26932502.
  • Dekoven, Marianne (1992). "The Politics of Modernist Form". New Literary History. 23 (3): 675–690. doi:10.2307/469225. JSTOR 469225.
  • Warner, William B. (1992). "The Elevation of the Novel in England: Hegemony and Literary History". ELH. 59 (3): 577–596. doi:10.2307/2873443. JSTOR 2873443.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_True_Story_of_the_Novel&oldid=1265416540"