Template talk:XfD relist

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Which substitution

Documentation contains a notice box which specifies {{subst:XfD relist}}, while the examples further down specify {{subst:Relist}}. Are both forms valid for this template? Please clarify in the documentation; thank you. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the lorem ipsum's

I think we should remove the lorem ipsum in the main page and rather put them as an example, in the /doc page.

As of now, it suggests that the arguments around the template would be somehow included in the templates, maybe given as arguments.

If no one responds, I guess I'll just boldly go on with it. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 11:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overlapping Replies

Lately, I've noticed some replies overlap relists at WP:RfD. It seems that project pages load up the following CSS selector with my skin/settings,

.mw-body p + ul,
.mw-body p + ol,
.mw-body p + table,
.mw-body p + dl,
.mw-body p + blockquote {
  margin-top: -0.5em;
}

which sets the top margin of a few html elements to -0.5em following a <p> element. This causes text indented with the wikitext : to overlap when replying to substitutions of {{Xfd relist}} which places a <p> element. First off, is this a problem others are seeing? See my sandbox for examples of this overlap (can't place here as talk pages have different styling).

The only CSS styling I've come across on project pages with respect to the <p> element are margin settings and these are locally overridden in this template with margin:0 0 0 -1em;. That makes the <p> element kinda meaningless and using a <div> element avoids the above CSS selector and overlap. Would anything break if the <p> element was swapped for <div> to avoid this styling problem? ⇌ Synpath 21:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After some checking this issue seems to be unique to the vector-2022 skin. Swapping to <div> does not seem to effect the vector, monobook or timeless skins. ⇌ Synpath 02:39, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that this template started life using the <div> element and it was switched to <p> for the sake of the Reply tool a few years ago. As far as I can tell (sandbox test here) this is no longer necessary. ⇌ Synpath 00:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Made the change ⇌ Synpath 23:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]