Template talk:User recursively neutral
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I think the smaller size makes it even funnier (and it also fits in with most other userboxes' heights). Wouldn't you agree? —Nightstallion (?) 07:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- No! The smaller size makes it too difficult to read... -- Nikodemos 21:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- That's the point. If you want a readable version, use the "normal" one. —Nightstallion (?) 08:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I wasn't aware that you own this template. If you want an unreadable version, create your own rather than editing the one that other people use. -- Nikodemos 22:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- That's the point. If you want a readable version, use the "normal" one. —Nightstallion (?) 08:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
This is a rather silly thing to argue about. Perhaps compromise with a 7-point font? --Mr. Billion 05:01, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- shrugs If you insist; I was under the impression that this template was meant to be silly, not readable, and that editors who wish to express their neutrality readably would simply employ the "normal" version. —Nightstallion (?) 09:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- The template is meant to be funny, and nothing is funny if you can't read it. Perhaps we should just make a poll and invite everyone who uses this template to vote. -- Nikodemos 23:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well, you can read it after you turn the font size up. But yes, we could and should do that, probably. —Nightstallion (?) 09:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- The template is meant to be funny, and nothing is funny if you can't read it. Perhaps we should just make a poll and invite everyone who uses this template to vote. -- Nikodemos 23:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
I changed the background color on the image to white so the scales don't look so cut-and-paste. I hope nobody minds--if you do, go ahead and change it back, no discussion necessary. I just think it looks a little neater this way. Aelffin 13:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Your browser must display stuff differently than mine. You saw white space around the scales? Is that it? In this version, I see the scales on the same background as the rest of the left side of the box--no white. If your change fixes the problem for you, though, then that's fine. --Mr. Billion 13:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm. That's odd. Must be the browser. On my browser, the old version you linked has scales surrounded by white, with two broad bands of dark pink above and below. Aelffin 16:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Yep, that's it. Using Firefox, there's no problem. I just tried viewing it in Internet Explorer and got the same thing you described. --Mr. Billion 06:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)