Template talk:Unreliable medical source/doc

Purpose

I've seen usage of this template and am confused as to its meaning and purport. Does it mean that this is not from a recognized medical source (ie quack medicine) or does it mean that it is a primary medical source and therefore not suitable to be quoted in WP? These shouldn't be confused. Can the author please add a clarification? Chris55 (talk) 21:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd hope it's being used to identify sources that editors feel might fail WP:MEDRS. --Ronz (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]