Template talk:US Army SFG

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the US Army SFG template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Military history: North America / United States Template‑class

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Template

This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Military Free-Fall School

Jasonkwe, I understand your thinking behind reverting my edit that added the Military Free-Fall School (MFFS) to the list. If you want to keep it focused on Special Forces only training, then we need to remove the Special Forces Underwater Operations Course link as well for it too is addended by Rangers and even select cadets, not just Special Forces soldiers assigned to a dive ODA. This is true for the Military Free Fall School as well.

Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW-dFhkV1qQ

McChizzle (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@McChizzle Ahh, I see what you mean. I don't want to make this personal at all, I honestly just was not sure about the reasons for inclusion. I did add the SF Underwater Operations page in the navbox but, to be honest, I have had second thoughts about its inclusion. The reason I included it in the first place was for its discussion of SF specific underwater operations, not necessarily for the school. But the article itself is not that great and is unfocused IMO.

Anyway, I had just meant to try to keep the SF navbox related to stuff that is specifically SF to keep it from getting unfocused. I just felt that opening the navbox to commonly attended schools/trainings rather than core ones, like you said, that are SF specific (dunno if there are any that will ONLY admit SF and none others) or schools that are mandatory for SF, might be a slippery slope that leads to inclusion of all sorts of other vaguely related articles that kinda dilutes the focus of the navbox itself, you know? Look forward to hearing back from you. I apologize in advance if I don't reply immediately as I'm kinda patchy on my wiki activity lately. Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]