Template talk:The Texas Chainsaw Massacre

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Horror

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles

United States: Texas

	United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	Texas portal This template is supported by WikiProject Texas.

Bignole and removing clearly related articles because of bias and not understanding the point of navboxes

Would be nice it you quit doing that.★Trekker (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fucking annoying idiots who don't know what navboxes are for or how they should be used. "Oh bo ho it's a porno"★Trekker (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the navbox is The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (franchise). The film being added is not part of that. You may want to read WP:NPA at this point. MarnetteD|Talk 17:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Porn Parody Inclusion

Apparently, since people don't like to follow WP:BRD, I'll start this. There is currently a porn parody listed as a related article. It is my contention that this is not a related article. This navbox is for articles directly related to the TCM franchise. It's not an indiscriminate collection of links to everything that might reference TCM or make fun of TCM. Just like any other nav box for film franchises.

For example, see that Template:Batman in film, Template:Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Template:Friday the 13th, Template:Seinfeld, Template:Spider-Man films, Template:Super Mario do not have porn parodies listed in their templates. They all have porn parodies, but they aren't listed in those templates because those templates are for specific purposes (the linking of directly related material). A porn parody isn't related to the franchise...it's a parody. At best, it's a "See also" on any respective film page it is parodying. The TCM (or even the Halloween one) are not appropriate for this navbox because this nav box is for linking articles directly related to the topic for expanded knowledge. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There have been dozens of James Bond porno films. They are not included in that navbox. MarnetteD|Talk 17:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

I'm not sure why there is a push to try to re-categorize the nav links into various production houses, who didn't even produce the films only distributed the films. It isn't even being consistently applied, because you have "Original" and then "Lionsgate" and "Netflix" and then "remake series". The logic doesn't make sense. It seems like a poor excuse to artificially separate the films. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]