Template talk:Taxonomy/Anapsida
Appearance
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Parareptilia
[edit]Should we be using this instead of Parareptilia? Are they the same thing? This article suggests Anapsida is out:
- Tsuji, L. A.; Müller, J. (2009). "Assembling the History of the Parareptilia: Phylogeny, Diversification, and a New Definition of the Clade". Fossil Record. 12 (1). John Wiley & Sons: 71–81. doi:10.1002/mmng.200800011.
Is there a discussion of which to use? thanks, ErikHaugen (talk) 07:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
___
Anapsida is recognised as a paraphyletic group, and should not be anchored in Sauropsida. Sauropsida encompass only the critters after the synapsid/saurapsid spilt, while anapsida encompass amniotes from before the split as well. Petter Bøckman (talk) 09:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)