Template talk:RISC OS development graphical timeline

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
	This template is within the scope of the RISC OS task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

'RISC OS Open' and 'Community'

Just thinking 'RISC OS Open' and 'Community' should really be one entry. After all it's all done via RO Open.--Flibble (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your corrections - I knew someone would find a few errors. TBH I got a bit sick of looking at the thing.

Anyway, you've made a fair comment. I've initially included both 'RISC OS Open' and 'Community', in case there's a need for a significant distinction between when ROOL started work on cleaning out swear words etc. (and other more meaningful changes) and when Joe Bloggs gained access for submitting developments. The current timeline's a starting point, and probably won't stay in the current format for long! Also, you've probably also seen the parallel timeline for version releases (WIP), which I'm thinking of overlaying at some point. The OS labels to the right could then possibly be removed. Of course, if this combination looks pants then the idea can be dropped. Please feel free to have a play in my user space if you're bored! Cheers. --trevj (talk) 08:05, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NCOS

My WIP now includes NCOS. (The garish colours are just to help while editing.) Do you think it'll make sense when correctly annotated? --Trevj (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's getting a bit chaotic, it says only 'NC' which doesn't really help. Also, ROL and Pace started work back in 1999. I think the time might be better spent finding refs for NCOS work so we can add a text section to the page first.--Flibble (talk) 00:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It'll be properly annotated with appropriately placed labels when it's done. But yes I agree that NCOS should be in the text first. --Trevj (talk) 06:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)nb[reply]

So was NCOS just used in the Pace STBs, or was it related to Omega/Spinner? And what about Galileo? --Trevj (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NCOS starts from about 95/96 for the Network Computer project, as such predates Pace by a fair bit. It was used on various STB products http://acorn.chriswhy.co.uk/Computers/NetStation.html . I believe it branched from RISC OS 3.60 and was called RISC OS 3.61 before being named after the NC http://acorn.chriswhy.co.uk/Computers/OM_STB20.html, but would have to refind the reference for that. There was also a reference somewhere to it being merged back into the HEAD whilst at Pace. By the time it was on the Bush STB at Pace it was known as RISC OS-NC http://acorn.chriswhy.co.uk/AfterAcorn/BushInternet.html and RO-STB http://acorn.chriswhy.co.uk/AfterAcorn/Pace_DSL4000.html. I hope this has muddied the waters further :D--Flibble (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up to your other bits, Galileo was a completely different OS from RISC OS/NCOS, it was a microkernel based OS that was intended to replace RISC OS, not sure if it actually got further than the press releases. And yes Omega/Spinner are probably codenames for NC hardware.--Flibble (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mostly now included at NCOS. --Trevj (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Task for newcomers

This could do with bringing up to date for 2012 and release 5.18 if anyone fancies it! -- Trevj (talk) 21:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]