Template talk:Non-free newspaper image

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles

Journalism

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles

Photos to CSD?

I think (by reading the license), it can be assumed that photographs (with no text) uploaded under this license are to be tagged with {{db-badfairuse}} (CSD I7) since they are clearly not a "scan of a newspaper page or article".

Examples in Category:Fair use newspaper covers (if not now deleted):

feydey 15:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a correct interpretation of it. None of those images are correctly tagged. --Fastfission 15:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative weeklies?

From the article on Alternative weekly:

An alternative weekly is a type of weekly newspaper that eschews...
(snip)
The typical alternative weekly is tabloid-sized and printed on newsprint.

This would indicate that alt weeklies are indeed newspapers, and front page images added to such articles should be tagged with {{Newspapercover}}. However, sometimes the distinction is not clear, as some publications which could be described as altweeklies (often members of the Association Of Allternative Newsweeklies) intentionally brand themselves as "magazines". The tabloid format of altweeklies gives them a similar size to most magazines, but I would suggest that any publication printed on newsprint (and usually without staples or binding) meets the definition of a newspaper, regardless of branding, but I'm sure some would disagree. Also, not being able to hold a physical copy in my hands of far away publications mean I really don't know whether or not they have bindings or are printed on newsprint. I guess I'm just hoping someone could offer a bit of insight here. Since I've been adding front page images to many newspaper and altweekly articles, I'd like to know if I'm using the correct fair use rationale to comply with WP:FU, and perhaps should be using {{Magazinecover}} instead. Of course, if the two rationales are interchangable then this may all be just pointlessly semantic. Any thoughts? -Tobogganoggin ^talk 01:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?

In the first bullet point, is the word "of" supposed to read "or"?

I.e.: "to illustrate either the publication or the article or issue in question"

--Ipoellet (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing category

The template adds the category Category:Fair use newspaper covers to files, the template appears to be used for images from newspapers that are not newspapers covers which is confusing but I suspect the template is being incorrectly used (example File:Don Levy in 1965.jpg). Should we just delete the template from files that are not covers or articles? MilborneOne (talk) 12:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]