This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
The redlinks were removed "as per WP:NAV". I have re-added the redlinks, as per what WP:NAV actually says: "Red links should be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles" (my bolding). These are very likely to be developed into articles. If you're going to follow the advice of an essay, at least read what it actually tells you. It is further worth noting that WP:NAV is just an essay, not a guideline, and far less than a policy. Standard practice is to leave redlinks as encouragement to editors to create the articles, and therefore to improve Wikipedia. As far as I know, essays which suggest procedures which make an improvement of Wikipedia less likely never normally get to the point of being regarded as guidelines (though some recent changes to Wikipedia may suggest otherwise). Grutness...wha?12:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
