Template talk:Neverwinter Nights series

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Fair use image

I removed the eye image, as it was a violation of Wikipedia's fair use policy. Please remember that fair use images can only be used in the article main space (the main page though is an exception)--TBCΦtalk? 07:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original original NWN

Should the old AOL Neverwinter Nights thingie that used the gold box engine be included in the template? 216.228.20.138 04:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although it carries the same name, and is set in the same (DnD) universe it is a completely different product that is not a part of the NWN series started by BioWare. So I think It doesn't belong here. I'm taking the liberty to remove it. --SevenMass (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The premium modules belong here

I Highly disagree that the premium modules are not noteworthy enough to be mentioned here. They are a part of the series, and therefor should be in the list. I can agree that the canceled premium modules Tyrants of the Moonsea and Darkness over Daggerford are removed, and I can agree that Witch's Wake and ShadowGuardare not worthy of their own wiki article (so I linked them to the kingmaker expansion article instead) But all the official premium modules that are released are officially a part of the series, there is no reason not to mention them here. --SevenMass (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Premium modules are official releases from BioWare, they received plenty of coverage on various NWN outlets and general gaming magazines: -SevenMass (talk) 19:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GameSpot mentions the release of Pirates of the Sword Coast [1] and Infinite Dungeons [2]
The Brittish game site Totalvideogames mentions the release of Pirates of the Sword Coast [3]
Shacknews mentions the release of Wyvern Crown of Cormyr [4]
InsideMacGames mentions Wyvern Crown of Cormyr [5]
IGN mentions the release of Infinite Dungeons [6]

They just mentioned. There is no in depth articles in them. If there is previews, articles and reviews then it can be added. Those links says nothings. Hence it fails notability.--SkyWalker (talk) 07:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are an official part of the series! Even if these specific parts of the series are by themselves less well known than other parts, or than the series as a whole, they still should be mentioned. I mean, if someone makes a lists of episodes from a well known TV series, (for example) should that list exclude individual episodes that people wrote less about than others? That would make the list incomplete, and defeat the purpose of that list as well! Even If you don't think they deserve their own article on wikipedia, you could at least mention them with non-hyperlinked text, or direct all links to the same one article that describes all premium modules. (as done here with the episode list here) --SevenMass (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But anyway, for your pleasure: GameBanshee: Wyvern Crown of Cormyr Review Infinite Dungeons Review Pirates of the Sword Coast Review Kingmaker Review ShadowGuard Review Witch's Wake Review This site gives all of them a very brief review, I found a PotSC review here, and a ShadowGuard review, and a WCoC review. --SevenMass (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]