Template talk:NRHP in Kentucky by county

This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places

United States: Kentucky

	United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
	Kentucky portal This template is supported by WikiProject Kentucky.

Missing list markup

the use of list markup was recently changed to pipes with the rationale being that pipes are easier to read. well, it turns out you can change the appearance of horizontal lists everywhere, with a simple change to your own personal common.css file. I have posted more details at MediaWiki talk:Common.css, but in brief

Open common.css
Add

.hlist dd:after,
.hlist li:after {
    content: " | ";
    font-weight: normal;
}

and all the bullets will change to pipes. the problem with not using list markup is basic accessibility, since the list is not parse as a list by screen readers. we should change this back to horizontal lists unless there is a more compelling reason not to do so. Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the pipe format definitely is not better for screen readers. Bullets are also the common format for these types of lists. Bgwhite (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]