Template talk:MultiLicenseWithCC-By-All

CC 2.5 and 3.0?[edit]

I got this request on my talk page. That got me thinking whether we should include Creative Commons 2.5 and 3.0 into this template. Please comment. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this. I found {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Future}}. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 01:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incompatible?[edit]

Is it even possible to dual-license under cc-by-nd cc-by-nc and GFDL? They're not compatible with each other, so how come? --87.52.31.106 14:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The person reusing can choose which license to use. They'd presumably choose one that is compatible with the project they intend to use it in. Reach Out to the Truth 19:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia licensing update[edit]

{{editprotected}} Please replace the text under the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL] in this template with under [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's copyright terms]], per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie ⚔ 11:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 26 July 2021[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I request that this template be moved to Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 18:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse#Protected_edit_request_on_26_July_2021. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]