Template talk:Judeo-Christian navboxes

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Split, 29 January 2024, see discussion.
No consensus, 4 February 2022, see discussion.

	Christianity portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
	Bible portal This template is supported by WikiProject Bible.

Judaism

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles

Split

Let's revisit the attempted split of this navbox by Yallayallaletsgo. The scope of this navbox is arbitrary and unclear, as it contains members that are not common to both Judaism and Christianity. I suggest a split into:

{{Judaism and Israel navboxes}}
{{Christianity navboxes}}

And have both include a third {{Tanakh OT navboxes}} (named by analogy to {{Tanakh OT}}). Ibadibam (talk) 22:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing any dissent to this proposal so I will move forward with it in a few days or weeks. Ibadibam (talk) 23:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ibadibam, I came to this talk page to suggest exactly this – any plans to make the split? ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 20:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ezlev: If you'd like to take it on, please feel free! Otherwise I'll get to it eventually. Ibadibam (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See this TFD discussion. There are already two templates that exist, so if the decision is to split, those templates should be moved to the new names in order to preserve their history. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those templates were only just created by the nominator of that TfD (without, I note, any participation here), and I already recommended the move there. Ibadibam (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So although in this discussion there was a weak local consensus to split, we now have a no-consensus close on the TfD (wish Ploni had checked here first before all that!). So what's the way forward now? Ibadibam (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]