This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
I'm not sure what was up with that last series of edits, but if you have a look you'll see that the version I've restored here has a well organized structure that makes sense to read and is easy to follow. Experiments to a sandbox, please? Thanks. Wiggy! (talk) 04:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted it back. If you would have looked a little closer you would have noticed that women's football in Germany was removed from here and place into its own template. The structure that I have makes sense, is easy to read and well organized. Thanks! --Pinkkeith (talk) 21:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, just as the structure we had before. So why do you think yours is better? Why should women's and men's football not be in one template? OdinFK (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I never said it was better. I just mentioned what the change was. I followed {{Women's football in England}} and not to mention all of the other football templates out there that have their own template, but could be merged into one. --Pinkkeith (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
