Template talk:Extra music sample

Untitled

This template appears to be broken - see Ticket to Ride or Something's Going On. Colonies Chris (talk) 23:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's broken.

As of today, the only problem with "Ticket to Ride" was unrelated to this template. There was an extra set of braces following the Infobox stuff and they were appearing on the page. I deleted them and the page looked fine, including the music sample.
The problem with Something's Going On is that this template was not designed for use with {{Infobox Album}}. As described in the documentation, it's supposed to be used with {{Infobox Single}} and {{Infobox Song}}. Evidently, the way "Misc=" is handled in {{Infobox Album}} is different. I didn't investigate further than that. John Cardinal (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template name

Is there a reason why the template is called "extra musicsample", with the last two words smushed together? Would I be in the minority if I asked for it to be moved to "Extra music sample"? – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:16, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Default quotation marks in title parameter?

Would it make sense to have the template default the quotation marks in the |title= parameter (similar to {{cite web}})? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple tracks

Is there any way to use the template for multiple tracks with the heading "Audio sample" appearing once as "Audio samples"? Squandermania (talk) 13:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Include a merge notice

Jc86035: It would be helpful to include a notice here ~~and Template:Audiosample~~ similar to Template:Infobox single: and ==Usage==

Thanks. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jc86035: This doesn't need to be added to {{Audiosample}} anymore. Also, would it be possible to get a monthly error-type report for {{Extra music sample}}? It helps with the clean up. —Ojorojo (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ojorojo: I've never made a monthly report but there are some other users who run bots for those. Is there something in particular that the tracking categories for {{Audio sample}} aren't doing? Should separate trackers be added to Extra music sample? Jc86035 (talk) 06:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035:: It's unclear what the problems may be in Category:Audio sample to be checked. Some of the |description= (same as |title=?) entries may repeat the info already in the infobox or are too long, but they are what the editors added (don't seem to be a reason to hold up the merger). Do other tracking categories show specific problems? —Ojorojo (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ojorojo: I think how that was supposed to work was the template would get substituted and then other editors were supposed to manually remove the category from the substituted template through some means. This was because I found a lot of descriptions which were unnecessary because they didn't have any information that the header couldn't impart. Should the category just be removed from the template entirely? Jc86035 (talk) 04:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: I thought these samples templates were going to merged using a bot, so the priority was fixing the problems that prevent the bot operation. Descriptions such as in this infobox don't repeat anything and help identify it. So, I don't think |description= should be removed from {{Audio sample}}; maybe  or "see Parameters guidance" can be added to the Code section in the documentation to cut down on its overuse. Of course, many more, such as in this GA, are superfluous. However, I don't see that this is a priority for the merger. Once that is completed, clean up of the descriptions may proceed. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ojorojo and TheSandDoctor: Is there a different place where this is being discussed, or should the template just be replaced by substitution now? Jc86035 (talk) 17:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It could be done and I do know of how to do it with a bot, but I think some wider discussion is needed. I have now watch listed this talk page. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: All instances of {{Audiosample}} have been converted to {{Audio sample}}, which was noted at WP:TFD/H "Arts 2017 May 10 – Audiosample"[1] (will that template be deleted?). Otherwise, I'm not aware of any other actions or discussions. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ojorojo: I've redirected it to the post-merger template. Was {{Extra music sample}} not replaced concurrently? I converted this template to a wrapper as well, and the same TfD discussion applies. Jc86035 (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: At 700+, {{Audiosample}} wasn't a good bot candidate. However, with 1,600+ {{Extra music sample}}, it seems appropriate. Additionally, the parameters are closer to {{Audio sample}}, which should make it easier. —Ojorojo (talk) 18:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: As Jc86035 notes, the same TfD discussion applies.[2] To move this along, what additional discussion do you feel is necessarry? —Ojorojo (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The comment about the TfD was made after mine and I was not aware of it. In light of that, I think that there is enough to move forward with this. I shall get a prototype working and submit a BRFA, if that is okay with everyone here @Ojorojo and Jc86035:. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Sounds good. Although I don't know the technical details, let me know if support is needed at BRFA. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Just to check, is DeprecatedFixerBot substituting {{Infobox single}} (which is supposed to be being merged)? I've just realized it's not included in any of the tracking categories by default because of the way it's written as a wrapper of {{Infobox song}}. Jc86035 (talk) 09:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: That is what you want, correct? And you can create a tracking category if you wish, but I have developed ways around that by grabbing the list of transclusions and running through that instead. Just requires an extra like 30 seconds work ;) --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: Yes, that template should be substituted. Thanks. Jc86035 (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: BRFA has been filed and approved. Have been trying to figure out how to run it on tools without any luck, so will probably just run it my usual way soon. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]