Template talk:City of Adelaide suburbs
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Suburbs of the City of Adeliade
[edit]According to UBD, there are only two: Adelaide and North Adelaide. Adelaide is everything south of the river, including the park lands, and North Adelaide is everything north of the river. --AtD (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- a) Presumably you mean: "Adelaide is everything south of the river, including the park lands, and North Adelaide is everything north of the river, including the park lands."?
- b) Which year UBD, and which bit of it, says there are two suburbs, and how does it say that? (tone of voice: "polite enquiry" (as distinct from "hostile challenge"))
- c) Are you aware that UBD is not error free? (tone of voice: "polite enquiry")
- d) I agree that the park lands are not a suburb as such, but they are an important and significant part of the "City of Adelaide"; they are what gives Adelaide much of its "personality" and "character". Although not ranked as a "suburb", they can't not be mentioned. Hence, I (and others) feel they should be there in the list, and I feel that they should be presented in a manner that denote that they are different from Adelaide and North Adelaide. I had considered (See also Adelaide Parklands), but wondered if that was perhaps rather too clumsy. What are your thoughts on the matter?
- e) P.S. I changed the order: they were alphabetic (North Adelaide, South Adelaide); I agree they should be (North Adelaide, Adelaide), but they should also be in sort - i.e. (Adelaide, North Adelaide).
- Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm happy with the presentation you've put up. And for the record, the UBD is backed up by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (go to their Census data page, unfortunately I can't get a link that works because it's dynamic). --AtD (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm happy with the presentation you've put up. - Thank you. (That makes life easier!)
- And for the record, the UBD is backed up by the Australian Bureau of Statistics - That's interesting. (I didn't know that.) Never-the-less, "Are you aware that UBD is not error free?" (Specifically, I'm referring to the 2008 edition.)
- Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)